Nov 19, 2025 Planning and Zoning

ALL RIGHT. GOOD EVENING. AT 6:00 WITH A QUORUM PRESENT, WE'LL CALL THE MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO ORDER FOR NOVEMBER 19TH,

[00:00:09]

SO IF WE'RE IF YOU'RE HERE TO SPEAK ABOUT SOMETHING THAT IS ON OUR AGENDA, YOU'LL NEED TO WAIT UNTIL THAT IS UP FOR DISCUSSION AND THEN WE WILL CALL YOUR NAME. IF YOU HAVE NOT YET FILLED OUT A PUBLIC COMMENT CARD AND YOU INTEND TO MAKE A COMMENT, WOULD YOU PLEASE DO THAT AND THEN HAND IT TO THE TO THE TOWN STAFF DESK UP HERE, AND WE'LL CALL YOUR NAME WHEN IT'S YOUR TURN TO SPEAK.

FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS OUR CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. THE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FROM THE LAST MEETING, OCTOBER 15TH IS EVERYONE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THOSE MOTION TO APPROVE.

CHAIRMAN YOU STILL NEED TO CALL THE PUBLIC COMMENT.

I'M SORRY. EXCUSE ME. I'M EXCUSED. FOR THOSE ITEMS THAT ARE NOT ON THE AGENDA, IF YOU'RE HERE TO SPEAK ON SOMETHING, NOT ON THE AGENDA, NOW WOULD BE THE TIME FOR YOU TO SPEAK.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE THAT WISHES TO TALK ABOUT ANYTHING NOT ON THE AGENDA? OKAY, SEEING I THOUGHT SO. SEEING SEEING NO ONE COME FORWARD, WE'LL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THAT PUBLIC COMMENTS AND THEN MOVE ON TO OUR CONSENT AGENDA

[C. Consent Agenda Items]

I HAVE A SECOND. SECOND. WHO WAS AT THE SECOND? OKAY. ALL RIGHT. LISA BURTON IS SECONDED. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY RAISING YOUR HAND.

ALL THOSE OPPOSED BY THE SAME. THE MOTION CARRIES.

THE FIRST ITEM UP IS ITEM D ONE TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND DISCUSS AND CONSIDER MAKING RECOMMENDATION TO TOWN COUNCIL REGARDING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT

[D. Public Hearing Items]

THE ASSEMBLY HOUSE. THANK YOU. CHAIRMAN. GOOD EVENING.

COMMISSIONERS STAFF AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY.

BEFORE I DO THE PRESENTATION, I WANTED TO INTRODUCE OUR NEW TOWN ATTORNEY, ALLISON COTTON.

SHE'S GOING TO BE HELPING US MOVING FORWARD ON PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND OTHER RELATED MATTERS.

FROM THE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, PLEASE WELCOME HER.

DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT. SO THE FIRST ITEM ON YOUR AGENDA IN TERMS OF PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS IS THE APPLICATION FOR THE ASSEMBLY HOUSE.

ON YOUR SCREEN, THE PROPERTY IS SHOWN IN THE LIGHT GREEN OR CYAN OUTLINE.

IT'S RIGHT NEXT DOOR TO TOWN HALL. IT'S ONE OF OUR MOST VISITED LOCATIONS, IF I MAY SAY SO MYSELF.

WHICH CONTAINS THE HOPE COFFEE SEVERAL OFFICE TENANTS AND USED TO HAVE THE SETTLERS TABLE RESTAURANT UNTIL LAST YEAR, SO THE PROPERTY IS ZONED LOCAL RETAIL AND THE ADDRESS IS 129 NORTH COLLINS ROAD.

THE REQUEST IS. THE REQUEST IS TO ALLOW SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES FOR ON PREMISE CONSUMPTION WITHIN THE ASSEMBLY HOUSE RESTAURANT, AS WELL AS SALE OF BEER AND WINE FOR OFF PREMISE CONSUMPTION AS PART OF THE ASSEMBLY HOUSE MEMBERSHIP CONCEPT, AND I'LL ELABORATE ON BOTH AND WHERE THEY ARE GOING TO HAPPEN IN FUTURE SLIDES.

STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE BACKGROUND MEMO.

ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION SO FAR? NO.

ALL RIGHT. I INVITE THIS THING SOMETIMES DOES NOT WORK.

DO YOU HAVE IT ON SLIDESHOW? RIGHT. I'M SORRY.

SOMETIMES THIS CLICKER DOESN'T WORK. OKAY. SO A LITTLE BIT ON THE FLOOR PLAN OR WHY WE ARE DOING THIS. SUP? BEFORE I GO INTO THE SQUARE FOOTAGE AND EVERYTHING.

SO IN THE CENTRAL AREA OF THE SLIDE HERE, YOU CAN SEE THE OVERALL SITE PLAN.

THERE ARE TWO BUILDINGS ON THIS PROPERTY. THE FRONT BUILDING IS WHERE IT FACES COLLINS ROAD, CLOSE TO COLLINS ROAD. IN BETWEEN THE FRONT BUILDING AND THE REAR BUILDING, THERE IS A OPEN PATIO OR PORTION OF IT IS COVERED, AND THE BACK PAD BACK BUILDING ALSO INCLUDES THE COVERED PARKING AREA OR THE PARKING GARAGE.

SO THE TWO BUILDINGS OUT OF WHICH YOU SEE THE GREEN OVAL SHAPE ON THE FRONT BUILDING, THAT'S WHERE THE SETTLERS TABLE RESTAURANTS ARE RIGHT NOW.

THE ASSEMBLY HOUSE RESTAURANT IS GOING TO BE LOCATED OR IS CURRENTLY LOCATED AND THE RIGHT HAND SIDE, THE ARROW POINTS OUT TO THE DETAILED FLOOR LAYOUT WHERE YOU SEE THE DINING AREA, THE BAR SPACE THE KITCHEN AREA ON THE SOUTHERN END OF THE FLOOR PLAN ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THAT SIDE PLAN THE SECOND BUILDING WHERE YOU SEE THE BLUE CIRCLE.

THAT'S THE CORNER. SWEET, SWEET. NUMBER 2103.

THE FRONT SWEET IS 1101. THE BACK SWEET IS WHERE THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE WINE SALES FOR OFF PREMISES CONSUMPTION.

[00:05:08]

OH, SORRY. SO ONE OF THE THINGS I WANTED TO INCLUDE THE ACP ORDINANCE WITH THE PACKET, BUT I REALIZED AFTER THE PACKET WAS POSTED, I FORGOT TO ATTACH THE ORDINANCE. SO I TOOK A SNAPSHOT OF THE ORDINANCE TEXT.

THERE'S THE EXISTING ORDINANCE, ORDINANCE NUMBER 2030.

THAT'S RIGHT. NOW APPLIES TO THAT PROPERTY. AND IT WAS IMPLEMENTED BY TOWN COUNCIL IN 20 2020, I BELIEVE DECEMBER OF 2020. SO THE ORIGINAL SEED ORDINANCE, THERE WERE TWO ISSUES, AS YOU CAN SEE FROM THE HIGHLIGHTED TEXT ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF YOUR SCREEN. FIRST OF ALL, IT RESTRICTED THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE SEED.

AND JUST TO CLARIFY THE DIFFERENCE OF TERMINOLOGY UNDER OUR UNDER OUR UDO WAS THE ACRONYM FOR SPECIAL USE DESIGNATION DURING THE 2021 COMPREHENSIVE REWRITE OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, OR UDO, THE SAME SUD WAS RENAMED INTO SPECIAL USE PERMIT AND THE ACRONYM BECAME SUPP. SO THAT'S ALL THE DIFFERENCE.

IT'S THE SAME PERMIT PROCESS FOR CERTAIN SPECIFIC USES.

SO IN THIS SCENARIO THE CURRENT ORDINANCE WAS ALSO FOR ALCOHOL SALES.

HOWEVER, IT APPLIED TO AN AREA THAT WAS LISTED ON THE ORDINANCE FOR 5194 SQUARE FOOT AND ALSO WITH THE ATTACHED SITE PLAN AND FLOOR PLAN.

IT DESIGNATED ONLY TO THE FRONT BUILDING WHERE THE PREVIOUS RESTAURANT WAS LOCATED.

SO THE FACT THAT THE NEW ASSEMBLY HOUSE AND WINE COMPANY IS TRYING TO DO BOTH ON PREMISE AND OFF PREMISE CONSUMPTION.

THE PREVIOUS ORDINANCE DID NOT ALLOW FOR OFF PREMISE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL.

AND THE SECOND THING IS THAT WE ARE NOW EXPANDING THIS USE TO THE BACK BUILDING THAT OTHER SUITE.

THAT'S WHY WE ARE ELIMINATING OR WE ARE PROPOSING TO BASICALLY ELIMINATE THE PREVIOUS STUDY, WHICH IS NOT BEING USED RIGHT NOW, AND INITIATE THIS NEW ORDINANCE THAT WOULD ALLOW THE ON PREMISE AND OFF PREMISE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL.

BUT TO THE WHOLE PROPERTY, THE REASON STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THIS SOP APPLY TO THE WHOLE PROPERTY OR THE LAND ITSELF, IS TO PROVIDE FLEXIBILITY AND AVOID FUTURE CONFUSIONS LIKE THIS.

WE DON'T WANT TO RESTRICT TO A CERTAIN SUITE OR A CERTAIN SQUARE FOOTAGE, SO THAT IN FUTURE, IF A DIFFERENT RESTAURANT WANTS TO OCCUPY THIS SPACE OR A DIFFERENT SPACE WITHIN THE SAME BUILDING, THEN THEY DON'T HAVE TO COME BACK THROUGH THE PROCESS AGAIN.

HOWEVER, THE LIMITATIONS ARE GOING TO BE THE BE SAME.

IT'S STILL GOING TO BE LOCATED WITHIN THOSE TWO BUILDINGS OR MAYBE A DIFFERENT SUITE.

IT'S NOT GOING TO GO BEYOND THAT LIMIT OF THE SITE, BUT IT'S GOING TO GIVE THE CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER AND FUTURE TENANTS MORE FLEXIBILITY.

THAT IS THE REASONING BEHIND THIS SUP NOW BEING REQUESTED FOR THE WHOLE PROPERTY, AND NOT JUST SPECIFICALLY TO A SQUARE FOOTAGE OR A SUITE AS IT WAS BEFORE.

SO IN A NUTSHELL, THAT'S WHAT WE ARE LOOKING AT FROM A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RECOMMENDATION.

THAT'S OUR FUTURE LAND USE MAP FROM OUR 2017 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, WHICH SHOWS THIS AREA AS THE TOWN CENTER, AS THE FUTURE LAND USE AND THE IDEAL LAND USES FOR THIS AREA ARE SMALL OFFICES, RESTAURANT AND SHOPPING.

SO THIS PROPOSED RESTAURANT USE WITH THE REQUEST FOR SUP FOR ALCOHOL SALES AS AN ACCOMPANYING USE, IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RECOMMENDATION.

WE HAVE SENT THE REQUIRED NOTIFICATIONS THE WITHIN THE 200FT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, AND WE HAVE RECEIVED ONE RESPONSE IN FAVOR OF THE REQUEST FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER.

STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR US, WE'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER.

AND ALSO, THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT HERE TONIGHT IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THEM. ALL RIGHT.

ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE PANEL? ANY QUESTION. ALL RIGHT.

IS THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT? ALL RIGHT. WITH NO COMMENTS.

DO I HAVE A MOTION FROM THE PANEL? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.

ALL RIGHT. MOTION TO APPROVE BY KEVIN POINTS.

I'LL SECOND. SECOND BY CARLA HAGEN. ANY DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY RAISING YOUR HAND.

THOSE OPPOSED BY THE SAME SIGN. ALL RIGHT. THE MOTION CARRIES.

NEXT UP FOR DISCUSSION. HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO DISCUSS AND CONSIDER MAKING A RECOMMENDATION TO TOWN COUNCIL REGARDING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE AMENDMENT, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, AMENDING THE CONCEPT PLAN.

PD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND SIGNAGE REGULATIONS ON A PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TOWN EAST BOULEVARD AND BELTLINE, KNOWN AS GATEWAY PARK. TOWN STAFF, WOULD YOU LIKE TO PRESENT? YES, SIR. IT WAS JUST LAST YEAR WHEN WE LOOKED AT THIS PD AMENDMENT.

[00:10:04]

THIS IS THE GATEWAY PARK PLAN DEVELOPMENT, AS IS SHOWN OR INDICATED ON THE MAP ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF YOUR SCREEN AND WHERE THE CURRENTLY THE TOMTOM, THE RETAIL STORE AND THE C STORE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION, ABOUT TO BE FINISHED AND OPENED, THE PROPERTY IS ABOUT 60.45 ACRES.

CURRENT REQUEST IS TO CHANGE THE CONCEPT PLAN BECAUSE WE HAVE RECEIVED AN APPLICATION ON ONE OF THE PAD SITES.

IT'S NUMBERED AS PAD SITE NUMBER TEN THAT WAS SHOWN ON THE CONCEPT PLAN AS HOTEL THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO CHANGE THAT LAND USE TO FROM HOTEL TO RETAIL AND RESTAURANT. WE HAVE RECEIVED AN APPLICATION FOR A SITE PLAN FOR RETAIL RESTAURANT SHELL BUILDING TO MAKE THAT SITE PLAN COMPLIANT WITH THE ZONING CONCEPT PLAN.

THIS AMENDMENT HAS TO BE PROCESSED FIRST, THEN REMOVE THE POCKET NEIGHBORHOOD SUBDISTRICT AND ALSO ADD ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE ALLOWANCE FOR CURRENT AND FUTURE PLATTED LOTS.

FOR THE REASONS EXPLAINED IN THE BACKGROUND MEMO, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT REQUEST.

SO THIS IS ON YOUR SCREEN ON THE LEFT SIDE. THAT IMAGE IS THE PROPOSED PD CONCEPT PLAN.

ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF YOUR SLIDE IS THE EXISTING PD CONCEPT PLAN.

AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE ARE THREE KEY AREAS OF CHANGE.

PRIMARILY IT USED TO BE THE ATHLETIC COMPLEX.

ORIGINALLY UNDER THE PD CONCEPT PLAN USED TO BE MOSTLY BASEBALL FIELDS.

NOW IT'S MORE MULTI-PURPOSE SOCCER FIELDS AND BALLFIELDS.

AND ALSO THE ATHLETIC CLUB BUILDING THAT WAS SHOWN ON THE ORIGINAL CONCEPT PLAN HAS BEEN REDUCED IN SIZE, SO YOU CAN SEE SOME PARKING LAYOUTS AND ACCESS DRIVES HAVE BEEN ALTERED.

THEN THE PAD SITE NUMBER TEN. THAT'S TOWARDS FACING BELTLINE.

AS YOU CAN SEE THE NUMBER TEN. IT USED TO BE CALLED HOTEL.

NOW IT'S GOING TO BE A RETAIL RESTAURANT USE.

THEN GOING TO THE NEXT SLIDE. THE SECOND BIG CHANGE WOULD BE REMOVAL OF THE POCKET NEIGHBORHOOD SUBDISTRICT.

SO THE GATEWAY PARK PD SINCE ITS INCEPTION IS 2020 HAD THREE SUBDISTRICTS OR OVERLAY DISTRICTS, IF YOU WILL, IN TERMS OF USE ALLOWANCES. SO IT HAD THE LOCAL RETAIL SUBDISTRICT AND THEN THE OR THE BASE ZONING, AND THEN THE SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT SUBDISTRICT AND POCKET NEIGHBORHOOD SUBDISTRICT.

THE USES ALLOWED WHERE MOSTLY ALL THE USES PERMITTED WITHIN LR ZONING DISTRICT AS LISTED AND AS ALLOWED WITH SUP, AND THEN ADDITIONAL USES WHERE HOME IMPROVEMENT CENTER AUTOMOBILE RENTALS WITHIN THE AC SUBDISTRICTS, OF COURSE. THE PLAYFIELD, ARENA, STADIUM, PARK OR PLAYGROUND FOOD TRUCK COURT.

THESE WERE SOME OF THE ADDITIONAL USES ALLOWED WITHIN THE POCKET NEIGHBORHOOD.

SUBDISTRICT. THE ONLY USE ALLOWED WAS AGE RESTRICTED HOUSING.

THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO REMOVE THE POCKET NEIGHBORHOOD SUBDISTRICT, AND AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE STAFF REPORT, I HAVEN'T LISTED THEM ALL HERE, WHICH RESULTS IN US GOING THROUGH THE PD ORDINANCE AND KIND OF STRIKING THROUGH ALL THE PN RELATED STANDARDS LIKE YOUR USES, YOUR DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR PN ZONING OR THE OVERLAY.

OTHER CHANGE THAT IS BEING REQUESTED WITH THIS PD AMENDMENT IS TO ADD FUTURE MONUMENT SIGN.

SO THE REQUEST IS TO ADD OR ALLOW ONE MULTI-TENANT OR SINGLE TENANT MONUMENT SIGN PER PLATTED LOT ONLY FOR THE PAD SITE ON WHICH THERE IS A REPLAT APPLICATION. THAT'S A COMPANION ITEM ON THIS AGENDA.

AND THAT'S WHERE YOU WILL SEE THE EXACT LOT NUMBER. THAT PARTICULAR LOT WILL HAVE TWO MULTI-TENANT MONUMENT SIGNS.

EACH MONUMENT SIGN THE LANGUAGE THAT'S BEING REQUESTED IS EACH MONUMENT SIGN MUST DEMONSTRATE A UNIQUE DESIGN AND UTILIZE THE MATERIALS AND COLORS OF THE BUILDINGS THAT'S GOING TO BE LOCATED ON THAT.

THAT LOT. BESIDES THAT, CERTAIN SIZE PARAMETERS ARE BEING PUT IN PLACE THAT NONE OF THE MONUMENT SIGN WILL EXCEED 12FT IN HEIGHT.

AND THAT'S INCLUDING THE TWO FEET MASONRY BASE.

IT SHALL NOT EXCEED NINE FEET, FOUR INCHES IN LENGTH AND TWO FEET, EIGHT INCHES IN WIDTH.

AND OF COURSE, AS APPLICABLE FOR ANY NEW SIGNAGE, THEY WILL BE REQUIRED TO GO THROUGH A PERMIT PROCESS THROUGH THE TOWN'S BUILDING PERMIT DIVISION. BECAUSE THE BASE PD ZONING FOLLOWS THE UDO SIGNAGE REQUIREMENTS.

IF ANY OF THESE EXCEPTIONS ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE PD LANGUAGE, THEY WILL HAVE TO EITHER COME BACK AND DO ANOTHER AMENDMENT, OR THEY HAVE TO FOLLOW THE BASIC SIGNAGE REQUIREMENTS.

SO THOSE ARE THE CHANGES BEING REQUESTED UNDER THIS AMENDMENT.

THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN SHOWS THIS AREA AS RETAIL.

THE RED COLOR ON THE MAP ON BELTLINE. THIS CATEGORY REFERS TO RETAIL AND SERVICE BUSINESSES THAT AIM TO MEET NEEDS OF BOTH LOCAL AND REGIONAL RESIDENTS.

THE USES, OF COURSE, INCOMPATIBLE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.

WE SEND THE 27 LETTERS OF NOTIFICATION WITHIN 200FT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.

[00:15:03]

BUT THEY WERE MOSTLY ABOUT QUESTIONS AND TRYING TO UNDERSTAND WHAT THE ZONING AMENDMENT WAS ABOUT.

I HAVEN'T RECEIVED ANY RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THE ZONING AMENDMENT REQUEST.

THAT'S ALL I HAVE FOR YOU TONIGHT ON THIS AMENDMENT? IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTION FROM THE COMMISSION.

I HAVE JUST ONE. GOING BACK TO SIGNAGE WHEN YOU SAY THAT THE SIGNS WILL BE UNIQUE, DO YOU FEEL CONFIDENT THAT THE SIGNS WILL BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE NEW SIGNS THAT WENT UP WITH THE TOM THUMB PROPERTY SO THAT THEY DON'T LOOK DRAMATICALLY DIFFERENT? OR IS THERE SOME SIMILARITY SO THAT IT LOOKS LIKE IT WAS WELL THOUGHT OUT? ONE ADVANTAGE WITH THE THE TOM THUMB PROJECT, AS YOU MENTIONED, IS WHEN WE DID THE PD AMENDMENT, IT WAS A VERY SIMILAR PROCESS WE WENT THROUGH LAST YEAR TO ACCOMMODATE THE GROCERY STORE AND THAT DEVELOPMENT.

ONE BIG ADVANTAGE WITH THAT PROJECT OR THAT PD AMENDMENT PROCESS WAS THERE WAS A DETAILED SIGNAGE EXHIBIT THAT WAS PART OF THE PD AMENDMENT.

SO WE MADE THAT. IF YOU LOOK AT THE ATTACHED ORDINANCE, THE SIGNAGE EXHIBIT WITH THE GRAPHICS WERE PART OF THE PD ORDINANCE, SO THAT WAS EASY FOR US TO REVIEW AND ENFORCE.

SO WHEN LATER ON THEY CAME IN FOR THEIR SIGN PERMIT, ALL WE DID WAS WE REVIEWED THE PD ORDINANCE AND SAID, OKAY, THIS WAS ALLOWED. SO THIS IS WHAT YOU CAN DO.

SO THE PERMIT PROCESS WAS SIMPLER FOR US. AND ALSO IT GAVE US THE CONFIDENCE LEVEL THAT THIS IS WHAT WE HAVE IN THE ORDINANCE.

TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, FOR THIS PROJECT, STAFF HAD REQUESTED SIGNAGE DETAILS, BUT GIVEN THAT THIS IS A VERY EARLY STAGE FOR THEIR PROJECT OR THE SITE PLAN APPLICATION THAT IS BASICALLY TRIGGERING THIS PD AMENDMENT.

THE APPLICANT WAS NOT READY WITH SIGNAGE, GRAPHIC OR DETAILS.

HOWEVER, IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THE SIGNAGE FOR THIS GATEWAY COMPLEX, ALTOGETHER THE 60 ACRE SITE ARE UNIFORM IN DESIGN AND CONCEPT AND THEY DON'T VARY TOO MUCH BECAUSE THAT WAY IT WOULD RESULT IN A HODGEPODGE SIGNAGE PATTERN ALL ALONG BELTLINE.

AND YOU ALSO RISK HAVING TOO MANY SIGNAGE ALONG BELTLINE AS WELL.

SIGNAGE IS IMPORTANT FOR RETAIL AND RESTAURANT CLIENTS, WE UNDERSTAND THAT.

BUT YES A LEVEL OF UNIFORMITY CAN BE ENFORCED IF WE GET MORE DETAILS.

AND SO IN ORDER TO GET THOSE DETAILS WOULD WE AMEND OUR MOTION HERE TO MANDATE THAT YOU RECEIVE THOSE PRIOR TO PERMITTING OR WHAT IS OUR BEST MOVE FORWARD TO ENSURE THAT WE GET THOSE RENDERINGS? IF IF THE COMMISSION DESIRES TO SEE MORE SIGNAGE DETAILS OR BEFORE IT GOES INTO PERMITTING.

BECAUSE ONCE IT GOES INTO PERMITTING, AFTER ZONING, WHATEVER IS SUBMITTED, AS LONG AS IT MEETS THE HEIGHT AND SIZE RESTRICTIONS AND JUST THE MATERIAL RESTRICTIONS IN TERMS OF IT'S COMPATIBLE WITH THE MAIN BUILDING, THERE IS NOT MUCH CHANGES STAFF CAN REQUEST BECAUSE THE ORDINANCE IS NOT STRUCTURED TO ASK FOR A SPECIFIC TYPE OF SIGNAGE DESIGN, IF THAT HELPS.

DO YOU KNOW IF ANYBODY'S HERE THAT CAN ADDRESS THAT? I BELIEVE THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT HERE TONIGHT.

DEREK, COULD YOU GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, PLEASE? SURE. DEREK SALTER, 345 NEW HOPE ROAD AND 129 NORTH COLLINS.

THANK YOU FOR APPROVING THE SCP IN THE PREVIOUS ITEM.

THAT WAS A TECHNICALITY THAT WHEN I BUILT THAT BUILDING NEXT DOOR, I, I DIDN'T CHECK TO SEE THAT BOTH BUILDINGS WERE PART OF THE ABILITY TO SELL ALCOHOL.

SOMETHING WE'VE FIXED ON THE PD WHERE THE TOM THUMB THAT WE'RE DOING IS THERE WILL BE MORE AMENDMENTS TO THE GATEWAY PARK.

THAT'S JUST THE WAY IT IS WITH A PD. ONE OF THE ONES YOU'LL HEAR TONIGHT FROM ONE OF THE DEVELOPERS WHO'S GOING TO BUILD A BUILDING ON THE ON ONE OF THE PAD SITES.

THERE WILL BE LIKELY 4 OR 5 MORE DEVELOPERS THAT WILL BUILD BUILDINGS OVER THE NEXT TWO YEARS.

AND WE'LL BE BACK HERE AGAIN AMENDING THINGS.

BUT TO YOUR POINT OF THE SIGNS JUST TO GIVE YOU AN EXAMPLE OF THE SIZE OF SIGN, THE SIGN THAT WE JUST BUILT ON TOWN EAST, THAT'S BY THE RETAIL BUILDING WHERE YOU TURN IN TO GO TO THE TOM THUMB.

THAT IS THE SIZE, THE MAXIMUM SIZE SIGN THAT ANY OF THESE PAD SITES CAN BUILD.

[00:20:08]

I'M I'M A ARCHITECT BY TRADE, SO I LIKE CREATIVE THINGS.

I WANT BEAUTIFUL SIGNS. I'M A SPENDER. I SPEND TOO MUCH MONEY ON EVERYTHING.

PEOPLE HAVE TO REIN ME IN. BUT AS FAR AS THE DESIGN OF THESE SIGNS, THAT CRITERIA EVERYTHING HAS TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR APPROVAL.

SO I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S WHAT ADDITIONAL THINGS YOU WANT TO PUT ON THERE OR UPGRADES OR TO SHOW THE DESIGN, BUT AS LONG AS IT COMPLIES WITH THAT AND IT MEETS THE MATERIALS AND COLORS OF THE BUILDING.

SO IT'S KIND OF LIKE A IT'S RELATED, KIND OF LIKE THE SIGN IN FRONT OF PARK SQUARE.

IT HAS THE SAME STONE AND METAL AS WE PUT ON THE BUILDING OVER HERE.

THAT'S KIND OF THE WAY THE TOM THUMB SIGNS ARE AND THE RETAIL SIGNS ARE.

AND THAT'S WHAT I WOULD PROPOSE TO DO FOR ANY OTHER DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING THE ONE THAT YOU'LL HEAR LATER TONIGHT.

I WOULD SAY, JUST FOR ME PERSONALLY, IT'S NOT THAT IT'S NOT A MATTER OF TRUST.

I TRUST THAT YOU'RE GOING TO WANT TO BUILD A GOOD BUILDING WITH GOOD SIGNAGE.

BUT IF YOU GET HIT BY LIGHTNING TOMORROW AND SOMEONE HAS TO STEP IN AND TAKE YOUR PLACE.

MY DAUGHTER WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE MEMORIALIZE THE AGREEMENT.

AND MY PERSONAL FEELING IS I THINK TOWN STAFF WOULD FEEL MORE CONFIDENT IF THEY HAD AN ACTUAL RENDERING OF THE SIGN BEFORE IT'S PERMITTED AND BUILT. THAT WOULD BE THE ONLY ADJUSTMENT I PERSONALLY WOULD WANT TO MAKE IS JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT AS WE APPROVE OR NOT, THAT WE WE STIPULATE THAT WE WANT TO SEE THE SIGN BEFORE YOU, YOU GAIN FINAL APPROVAL FOR THE SIGNAGE PART, LIKE A THREE DIMENSIONAL RENDERING. JUST WHATEVER YOU HAVE PRESENTED IN THE PAST TO GET TOWN APPROVAL.

FOR EXAMPLE, FOR THE TOM THUMB BUILDINGS. YEAH, THOSE WERE TWO DIMENSIONAL, FULL COLOR ELEVATIONS OF EACH SIDE.

YEAH. SO WITH THAT, I THINK THAT MEETS THE NEED.

SO IS THAT NOT SOMETHING THAT WE ADDRESS IN THE THE DETAILED SITE PLAN WHEN WE APPROVE THOSE, BECAUSE THOSE ALL HAVE TO COME BACK THROUGH HERE WITH THE SIGNAGE, NOT BE A PART OF THAT PACKAGE. IT COULD BE.

BUT NO, NOT NOT ALL THE TIME. YES. RIGHT. SO YOU'RE NOT OPPOSED TO PRESENTING THOSE THOSE RENDERINGS? NO, I HAVE TO I HAVE TO APPROVE THEM ANYWAY. OKAY.

ALL RIGHT. WE'RE GOING TO COME THROUGH ME. ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I BET YOU'LL LIKE THEM. ALL RIGHT. ANY QUESTIONS FOR DEREK? THANK YOU DEREK. APPRECIATE IT. ALL RIGHT. ANY DISCUSSION FROM THE COMMISSION? ALL RIGHT. ANY PUBLIC COMMENT ON WHAT WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT ON THIS TOPIC? ALL RIGHT. NO ONE COMING FORWARD WILL CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENT.

ALL RIGHT. DO I HAVE A MOTION ON THIS ITEM? CHAIRMAN, I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE CASE 1860 1-Z GATEWAY PARK PLAN DEVELOPMENT ZONING AMENDMENT AS PRESENTED.

WITHOUT THIS, WITHOUT THE SIGN. OR DO YOU WANT TO ADD THE SIGN? ABSOLUTELY. OKAY WITH THE SIGN? LET'S JUST START OVER.

LET'S JUST START OVER ON THAT. RIGHT. OKAY. SO I WANT TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE CASE 1861 Z GATEWAY PARK PLAN DEVELOPMENT ZONING AMENDMENT WITH THE SIGN NOTATION PRIOR TO THE ZONING BE APPROVED BEING APPROVED.

ALL RIGHT. DO I HAVE A SECOND? ALL RIGHT. MOTION MADE AND SECONDED BY LISA BARTON.

ANY DISCUSSION? BURTON I'M SORRY I SAID BARTON.

BURTON. ALL RIGHT, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? RAISE YOUR HAND, PLEASE.

ALL RIGHT. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN IT CARRIES.

ALL RIGHT. OKAY. NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA, D THREE.

HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND DISCUSS. AND CONSIDER MAKING A RECOMMENDATION TO TOWN COUNCIL REGARDING A ZONING CHANGE REQUEST FROM HIGHWAY, COMMERCIAL AND SINGLE FAMILY THREE TO PLAN DEVELOPMENT, ZONING.

BASICALLY, THIS IS THE WOODLAND HILLS PLAN DEVELOPMENT THAT WE'RE GOING TO DISCUSS NOW. SIR. YES, SIR. THANK YOU SO MUCH. SO, THE ZONING CHANGE REQUEST IN FRONT OF YOU.

THERE ARE TWO PIECES OF THIS KIND OF THE PROPERTY PUZZLE.

ON THE MAP, AS YOU CAN SEE THESE ARE TWO UNPLATTED TRACTS, COMBINED ACREAGE OF APPROXIMATELY 56 ACRES OF LAND.

THE RIGHT HALF OR THE RIGHT SIDE TRACK THAT'S CURRENTLY ZONED HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL.

OR THE LEFT SIDE TRACT, CURRENTLY ZONED SF3 OR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT THREE.

THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING BOTH TRACKS BE REZONED TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING TO ALLOW A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT CALLED WOODLAND HILLS.

THEY'RE PROPOSING ABOUT 113 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS.

SIX OPEN SPACE, LOTS WITH A NET DENSITY OF 2.84 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.

[00:25:04]

UP SF FIVE ZONING DISTRICT STANDARDS. STAFF HAVE NO RECOMMENDATION ON THIS ZONING REQUEST.

AND I BELIEVE AS WE GO THROUGH THE FATHER, THROUGH THE SLIDES, IT WOULD I'D BE ABLE TO ELABORATE MORE.

SO ON THIS SLIDE, YOU CAN SEE THE PROPOSED CONCEPT LAYOUT OF THIS SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT.

SO YOU CAN SEE THE LOT LAYOUT VERY TYPICAL WITH TWO POINTS OF INGRESS AND EGRESS.

THE LEFT INGRESS POINT WOULD PROBABLY BE JUST AN ENTRY LIKE RIGHT IN RIGHT OUT.

AND THEN THE RIGHT SIDE. YOU HAVE A DIVIDED ENTRY POINT WITH THEIR ENTRY MONUMENT SIGN.

THEY'RE PLANNING TO PROPOSE THERE. THE PROPERTY FRONTS NOT IMMEDIATELY TO US HIGHWAY 80, SERVICE ROAD.

YOU HAVE THE SEA LIFE CHART AND THE LAKE POINT CHART ON THE TWO END CAPS AND TOWARDS THE MIDDLE.

THERE'S THAT PLANNED MONTESSORI SCHOOL THAT HASN'T REALLY BEEN OPEN FOR SOME TIME NOW.

AT THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY, YOU CAN SEE A PORTION OF IT IS KIND OF LIKE VACANT BECAUSE THAT'S THE FLOODPLAIN AREA.

SO THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO STAY OUTSIDE OF FLOODPLAIN OR NOT DISTURB FLOODPLAIN AREAS.

ALL THE DEVELOPABLE LAND IS GOING TO BE OUTSIDE OF FLOODPLAIN.

APPLICANT IS ALSO PROPOSING MEANDERING HIKE AND BIKE OR MEANDERING SIX FEET WIDE WALKING TRAIL TOWARDS THE SOUTHERN END OF THE PROJECT.

AND THAT'S TO CONNECT THE OPEN SPACE AREA TOWARDS THE MIDDLE OF THE PROJECT, WHERE YOU CAN SEE THE CUL DE SAC IF YOU GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE.

THOSE ARE SOME OF THE CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS THAT ARE PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.

AS I WAS TALKING ABOUT THE MEANDERING TRAIL ON THE LEFT MAP, WHEREVER YOU CAN SEE THE RED LINE, BECAUSE OF PROXIMITY TO THE HIGHWAY AND COMMERCIAL ZONING, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A EIGHT FOOT MASONRY SCREENING WALL WITH STONE COLUMNS.

AND THEN WHEREVER YOU SEE THE BLUE LINES, THAT'S WHERE THEY'RE PROPOSING.

WROUGHT IRON FENCE. NEXT TO OPEN SPACE OR TRAIL? NETWORK. THE REST OF THE LOTS, WHEREVER THEY HAVE THE SOLID WOOD FENCE IS GOING TO BE TOWARDS THE BACK AND SIDE OF THE LOTS.

LOT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN A NUTSHELL. MOSTLY MINIMUM 7000 SQUARE FOOT.

LOT SIZE, 80 FOOT TO ONE 20 FOOT. DIMENSION. UNLESS YOU HAVE SOME CULDESAC LOTS OR KNUCKLE LOTS.

THOSE WOULD BE SMALLER THAN 80 FOOT, LIKE 70 FOOT OR 75 FOOT MINIMUM DWELLING UNIT SIZE OR LIVING SPACE ARE GOING TO BE 2200 TO 2500 SQUARE FOOT.

THREE ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES PROPOSED FOR DWELLING UNITS SOME PARK BENCHES, PICKLEBALL COURTS, DOG WEIGH STATIONS, PROPOSED NON-REPETITIVE FACADE STANDARDS ARE ALSO PROPOSED.

GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE. THESE ARE SOME OF THE RENDERINGS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.

THESE ARE CONCEPTUAL? OF COURSE NOT BY SCALE.

SHOWING THEIR PROPOSED AMENITY AREA. SOME OF THE ENTRY, THE ENTRY TO THE NATURE WALK AWAY WALK PATH, THEY HAVE SOME SIGNAGE AND NICE ENTRY FEATURES AND LANDSCAPING.

FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE FUTURE LAND USE MAP STANDPOINT.

YOU CAN SEE IT'S NEXT TO US HIGHWAY 80. ALL THAT AREA WAS SHOWN AS EMPLOYMENT COMMERCIAL LAND USE.

THIS DESIGNATION IS REPRESENTATIVE OF COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE USES THAT PROVIDE EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES.

THESE USES ARE MORE SUITABLE ALONG THE US HIGHWAY 80 CORRIDOR.

THE PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE IS NOT IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.

AS YOU CAN SEE, IT WAS RECOMMENDED TO BE EMPLOYMENT COMMERCIAL.

THE PROPOSED USE IS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.

WE HAVE SENT 11 LETTERS OF NOTIFICATION WITHIN 200FT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.

WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY NOTIFICATIONS RELATED TO THE ZONING REQUEST FROM WITHIN THE 200FT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.

HOWEVER, WE HAVE RECEIVED A CERTAIN COMMENT CARDS AS WELL AS RESPONSES FROM RESIDENTS THROUGHOUT THE COMMUNITY IN OPPOSITION OF THIS ZONING REQUEST. I BELIEVE THERE ARE SOME THAT WERE RECEIVED TODAY.

AND THERE ARE SOME THAT WE HAVE RECEIVED THROUGHOUT THE WEEK.

THAT'S ALL I HAVE ON THIS ZONING REQUEST. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER.

ADDITIONALLY, THE APPLICANT AND HIS GROUP THE BUILDERS ALSO ARE PRESENT HERE TONIGHT, AND THEY DO HAVE A PRESENTATION FOR THE COMMISSION, IF YOU WOULD KINDLY ALLOW THEM TO HAVE. ABSOLUTELY.

THE BILL WOULD LIKE TO COME UP. IF YOU WOULD PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS FOR US.

YES, SIR. HONORABLE CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.

FOR THE RECORD, PAT ATKINS, OWNER OF SADDLE STAR DEVELOPMENT, THE DEVELOPER OF THE PROPERTY.

614 SUMMER OAKS, ROCKWALL, TEXAS. WE'RE EXCITED TO BE HERE AT THE TOWN OF SUNNYVALE.

[00:30:07]

WE GOT 56 ACRES OF LAND. THE CONFIGURATION LENDS ITSELF TO THE TWO POINTS OF ACCESS TO 80 AGAIN, WORKING WITH OUR CHURCH, THE CHURCHES ON BOTH SIDES THE THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY IS CONSTITUTES THE FLOODPLAIN WHICH WE'RE USING FOR THE OPEN SPACE PACKAGE THAT WE THAT STAFF POINTED OUT TO YOU INCLUSIVE IN THAT TRAIL AND PICKLEBALL AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE. THE EXCITING THING IS THE BUILDER THAT WE'RE BRINGING TO YOU WE'RE WE'RE GLAD TO BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THEM TO THIS TO THE TOWN OF SUNNYVALE. AND MR. HAYNES WILL PRESENT THE PARTICULARS OF THE PRODUCT AND IN THEIR HISTORY, IN THE METROPLEX, IN THE STATE OF TEXAS. SO THE AGAIN, WE HAVE WORKED WITH STAFF BACK AND FORTH FOR SEVERAL MONTHS TRYING TO COME UP WITH A CONFIGURATION THAT WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE FROM A PLANNING STANDPOINT FOR RESIDENTIAL USE ALONG THAT CORRIDOR.

THERE'S BEEN PREVIOUS APPLICATIONS THAT COMMISSIONED PREVIOUS COMMISSIONS, MAYBE IN COUNCILS HAD LOOKED AT FROM A RESIDENTIAL STANDPOINT AND ALSO COMMERCIAL STANDPOINT, IT JUST HASN'T COME TO FRUITION.

SO WE FEEL LIKE THE CREATION OF, OF WOODLAND HILLS WILL WILL ALLOW A COMMUNITY OF HIGH QUALITY RESIDENTIAL WITH A DYNAMIC BUILDER THAT WE WERE ABLE TO BRING TO THE PROJECT.

AND AND I'LL GET MR. HAYNES TO PRESENT THE PARTICULARS OF HIS PRODUCT TYPE BUT WE'LL GENERATE IN TODAY'S MARKET, ROUGHLY $750,000 HOUSING. AND WE'RE EXCITED TO BRING IT TO THE THE TOWN OF SUNNYVALE AND THE IMPROVEMENTS IMPLEMENTED IN IT. WE WE FEEL LIKE WITH THE THE THE NEED OF THE OPEN SPACE AND THE PROVISIONS OF TRAIL SYSTEMS AND CREATING THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT WE ALL WILL BE EXCITED ABOUT, AND ESPECIALLY WITH THE BUILDER THAT HAS COME FORWARD.

SO WITH THAT SAID I WOULD BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

DETAILS ANY ENGINEERING QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? OUR ENGINEERS HERE TONIGHT, MISTER CORN, IF YOU NEEDED TO DISCUSS ANYTHING OF THAT NATURE THAT WE'RE PROVIDING I'D LIKE TO COMPLIMENT STAFF ON ALL THEIR PATIENCE AND INPUT THAT THEY GAVE TO US TO MOVE US IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION, TO GET BEFORE COMMISSION AND HOPEFULLY GET SUPPORT OF OUR REQUEST.

THE AGAIN, I WOULD RESPECTFULLY REQUEST APPROVAL OF THIS ITEM AND AND ALLOW MR. HAYNES TO PRESENT THE HISTORY MAKER PRODUCT. AND I'D BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AND RESERVE TIME FOR IF THERE'S ANY COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC, ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS AT THIS POINT? ALL RIGHT. IF YOU'D LIKE TO GO AHEAD AND PRESENT, THEN WE'LL ASK QUESTIONS ONCE YOU'RE FINISHED. OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. DAVID HEINZ, HISTORY MAKER HOMES ADDRESS 1038 TEXAN TRAIL, GRAPEVINE, TEXAS.

APPRECIATE Y'ALL HAVING US HERE TONIGHT. BEEN IN MANY OF THESE OVER MY 15 YEAR CAREER IN REAL ESTATE.

SO I KNOW IT'S A IT'S A DUTY. AND THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR TIME.

HISTORY MAKER HOMES WAS STARTED IN 1949 BY THE MITCHELL FAMILY.

ORIGINALLY IN THE GROCERY BUSINESS OUTSIDE OF ARLINGTON.

MOVED INTO HOME BUILDING AFTER THAT DUE TO HEALTH CONCERNS.

DOCTORS HAD GET OUTSIDE. THEY STARTED BUILDING HOMES.

THERE YOU'LL SEE IN THE UPPER RIGHT HAND CORNER, PIKE VIEW ADDITION IN ARLINGTON.

THAT WAS THE FIRST SUBDIVISION THAT THEY MASTER PLANNED AND BUILT BACK IN 1958 OR 19 6858 AND HAVE CONTINUED TO BUILD IN THE AREA IN DFW. LET ME GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.

IN 2016, CEO NELSON MITCHELL MADE THE PUSH TO MOVE FROM A ENTRY LEVEL POINT OF SELLING HOMES TO WORLD WAR TWO VETS, MOVING UP TO A MORE QUALITY PRODUCT AND EXPANDING REACH ACROSS THE DFW AREA AND BREAKING INTO HOUSTON.

[00:35:04]

WE'RE NOW IN THE FOURTH AND FIFTH GENERATION OF THE FAMILY OWNED COMPANY AND EXPANDING IN OUR 76TH YEAR OF OPERATION.

SO WE ALSO HAVE A SAN ANTONIO AND HOUSTON DIVISIONS THAT WE MOVE FORWARD THROUGH.

AND DFW IS STILL THE CROWN JEWEL AND WILL CONTINUE TO GROW IN THIS AREA.

PRODUCT TRACK RECORD. WE'VE BUILT MANY HIGH END HOMES, AS YOU CAN SEE HERE ON THIS PHOTO HERE.

THIS IS SOME OF OUR 80 FOOT LOT PRODUCT. AND THEN A 100 FOOT LOT PRODUCT IN THE UPPER LEFT HAND CORNER THAT HAVE BUILT IN AROUND THE DFW AREA TRADING AT HIGH PRICE POINTS ACROSS THE METROPLEX AND MOVING ON INTO FURTHER TRACK RECORD THERE.

HERE YOU'LL SEE PICTURES OF HOMES THAT WE HAVE BUILT TODAY.

SOME OF WHICH ARE EMPLOYEES EVEN LIVE IN AND ARE MOVING THROUGH WITH SOME OF THE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS THAT WE'RE GOING TO BRING TO THIS PROJECT.

AS YOU CAN SEE HERE, THEY'RE PRETTY ADEQUATE.

WE'LL GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. AS STAFF SO SUPPORTED OUT THE LOCATION HERE IN IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO VARIOUS COMMUNITIES, BUT OFF THE HIGHWAY 80 CORRIDOR AND KIND OF HIDDEN IN THAT SOUTHEAST QUADRANT OF SUNNYVALE.

CURRENT ZONING THERE IS IN PLACE WITH THAT WHITE STAR MARKING AS WELL AS YOU CAN SEE, THE FLOOD FLOOD LINE FROM THE CITY MAP THAT WE PULLED THIS FROM.

WE'LL GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE AND ZOOM IN JUST A BIT.

THAT FURTHER OUTLINES THE SITE THERE OF HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL AND WHAT USES COULD BE THERE BY RIGHT TODAY.

AND SO OBVIOUSLY WE'VE, WE FEEL THAT A QUALITY HOME IS IS IS A BETTER USE FOR THIS COMMUNITY THAN, THAN POTENTIALLY SOME OF THESE LESS THAN DESIRABLE USES AS OUTSIDE STORAGE, ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, THINGS LIKE THAT. SO HERE WE'LL IDENTIFY THE FLOODPLAIN.

SO AS YOU CAN SEE, WE HAVE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN AND THEN ALSO FLOODWAY.

THE FLOODWAY BEING SUPER FLOODWAY, REQUIRING FEMA APPROVAL TO BUILD A BRIDGE OR ACCESS OR ANYTHING, AND THEN 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN THAT COULD BE USED TO, YOU KNOW, FACILITATE COMMUNITY PARK OR OR ATMOSPHERE FOR PEOPLE TO ENJOY.

CURRENT CONCEPT PLAN IS FOR 113 80 FOOT LOTS.

AS YOU CAN SEE THERE, WE'VE ALSO DONE A HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL THAT'S GOING TO BE A SIX FOOT PAVED HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL WITH SECURITY LIGHT BOLLARDS SO PEOPLE CAN WALK AT NIGHT AND SEE WHAT'S IN FRONT OF THEM. AND BEHIND THEM.

IT'S LOOPED IN WHERE THE AMENITY CENTER OF PICKLEBALL COURTS AND A PAVILION WOULD BE OUT OF THE FLOODPLAIN AND MORE BUILT INTO THE COMMUNITY AS A CENTRAL FOCAL POINT, WITH ACCESS FROM BOTH SIDES OF THE STREET THERE, AND THEN ALSO FROM THE TRAIL THAT LOOPS IN AND AROUND.

GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. HERE'S A DETAILED MAP THERE OF THE LOT LAYOUT.

HERE'S OUR MAIN ENTRANCE WOULD BE A DOUBLE BOULEVARD NEXT TO THE CHURCH ON THE SOUTHEAST SIDE OF THE MAP.

IF WE WENT BACK TO THAT DOUBLE BOULEVARD, WE WOULD WORK OUT ACCESS, BUILD SIGNAGE, MONUMENT SIGNS SO THAT IT'S A TRUE PRESENCE OF ARRIVAL.

WHEN GETTING TO THE COMMUNITY, YOU CAN SEE OUR ILLUSTRATION OF THE WALKING TRAIL DURING THE DAY.

TWO PICKLEBALL COURTS DOUBLE AS BASKETBALL COURT AS WELL, WITH A SUN SHADED PAVILION THERE WITH PICNIC TABLES, CHAIRS, ETC. AND THEN PARK BENCHES AROUND THE WALKING TRAILS WILL GO.

NEXT SLIDE. YOU CAN SEE ARTICULATE HOW THE BALLERS WILL BE PLACED OUT FOR LIT TRAIL, SO AT NIGHT PEOPLE CAN GO AND WALK THEIR DOGS OR HAVE A NICE SUNSET STROLL, COMPLEMENTING AMENITIES THAT WE'VE BUILT IN THE AREA AND LIFE LIKE WHAT IT WOULD BE.

SO TO DESIGN ELEMENTS THAT WE SPEAK OF, WE'VE GOT VARIED ROOF PITCH THERE AT THE TOP, ARCHES FOR THE DOORWAYS DECORATIVE MOLDING AND OVERHANG, THINGS LIKE THAT, THAT REALLY MAKE THE QUALITY OF THE HOME POP FROM THE STREET VALUE AND THE VIEW OF IT.

IT ALSO BUILDS OF QUALITY MATERIALS AND SO IT HOLDS UP LATER.

THEN WE HAVE A SHUTTER IN THE BOTTOM RIGHT, AS WELL AS DECORATIVE LIGHTING, THE DECORATIVE GARAGE.

AND SO WHILE NOT TRADITIONALLY ON A FORWARD FACING GARAGE THERE, BUT THAT GARAGE IS AN ELEVATED CEDAR AND STAINED.

AND SO IT HAS A HIGHER LEVEL OF PRESENCE. IT ALSO LASTS LONGER, AND IT'S JUST A MORE QUALITY GARAGE DOOR.

HERE YOU'LL SEE KIND OF A ZOOM IN ON THE TYPE OF FRONT PORCH WHERE THE METAL ROOF IS, AN ACCENT THERE, AS WELL AS THE STONE AND MASONRY WORK ON THE FRONT PORCH AND THEN SCONCE LIGHTING ON EITHER SIDE OF THE DOOR.

YOU KNOW, THE DECORATIVE BRANDING ABOVE THE FRONT DOOR ON THE BOTTOM RIGHT PHOTO THERE, AND HOW IT REALLY ACCENT MAKES THAT HOUSE POP AS A FRONT FEATURE.

YOU JUST KIND OF ZOOM IN ON SOME OF THOSE DESIGN ELEMENTS, HARDWARE AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE.

AND THEN TO KIND OF ZOOM IN AND SO YOU'LL SEE FROM THE, THE PD, OBVIOUSLY THAT WAS A QUICK PHOTO TO SHOW ROOF PITCH.

[00:40:01]

THIS IS ON A THIS IS A 40 FOOT PRODUCT ON A 50 FOOT LOT.

SO OBVIOUSLY THE LOTS GOING TO BE BIGGER. THEREFORE THE HOUSE IS GOING TO BE BIGGER. SO IF YOU COULD JUST IMAGINE A LITTLE BIT WIDER, A LITTLE BIT BIGGER TWO STORY PRODUCT THROUGHOUT THE COMMUNITY HERE, WE'VE GOT OUR REPETITION OF WINJE TO FOLLOW Y'ALL'S MONOTONY RULES.

AND WE'VE VISITED THIS WITH STAFF TO. COMBAT, YOU KNOW, MAKING SURE NOTHING LOOKS THE SAME.

IT'S NOT RUBBER STAMPED AND OR, AS I LIKE TO SAY, POSTAGE STAMPED ACROSS THE COMMUNITY.

HERE'S A DENSITY COUNT. THERE'S A TYPE ON THE DENSITY.

SO THANK YOU FOR STAFF. CORRECT. ALLOWING ME TO ADDRESS IT.

SO IT IS TWO TWO LOTS PER ACRE ACROSS IT 56 CURRENT VALUES GENERATING ROUGHLY $70 OF TAXABLE VALUE TO THE CITY TODAY.

ONCE THAT ROLLS THROUGH, THAT WOULD INCREASE TO $400,000 A YEAR ANNUALLY.

THEN OVER 20 YEARS YOU'RE LOOKING AT AROUND $8 MILLION.

THIS THE ISD WOULD GENERATE ANOTHER MILLION ONE A YEAR IN OVER 20 YEARS, AROUND 20 20,800,000.

SO QUITE A ADVANCEMENT IN TAX REVENUE AND AND GOODNESS FOR THE COMMUNITY.

ANY QUESTIONS COMMISSIONER? I'VE GOT A QUESTION.

SURE. PART OF THE PRESENTATION. YOU IT'S ON THERE, I GUESS FOR APPROVAL THAT MINIMUM LOT SIZE BE 7000FT².

BUT IT SEEMS LIKE FROM YOUR PRESENTATION YOU'RE BUILDING SOMETHING CLOSER OR BIGGER THAN THAT.

CAN YOU, I GUESS, EXPLAIN WHY IN YOUR REQUEST YOU'RE REQUESTING 7000 BE YOUR BASICALLY YOUR LOT SIZE STANDARD. THAT IS THE MINIMUM LOT STANDARD IN SOME ODD SHAPED LOTS.

FOR INSTANCE, ON CORNER IT MIGHT BE BIGGER AND THEREFORE WE WOULD ALLOW FOR TO FIT IT.

BASED ON STAFF COMMENTS FROM DENSITY, WE TOOK OUR LOT COUNT FROM AROUND 150 TO 120 AND THEN REFORMAT IT FOR THE PARK, AND NOW WE'RE AT ABOUT 113. SO WHAT WHAT IS YOUR AVERAGE LOT SIZE? 7000FT². THAT IS YOUR AVERAGE. YES, SIR. OKAY.

IT WON'T BE ANY SMALLER THAN THAT. IT'LL BE BIGGER THAN THAT BASED OFF 80 TIMES.

BUT YOU HAVE A YOU HAVE A PLAN LAND 600 IS THE TYPICAL LOT SIZE IS YOUR TYPICAL 80 BY 120 THAT'S SHOWN ON THAT SITE PLAN.

THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY OKAY. YEAH. ENGINEER HOME BUILDER.

SO 9600 IS A MINIMUM LOT SIZE. THERE WILL BE LARGER LOTS ON THE CORNERS.

AND AS DAVID POINTED OUT, AND ALSO ON THE CUL DE SACS AND SO ON.

SO BASICALLY YOUR MINIMUM SIZE, WHETHER THE 7000 NEEDS TO BE ELIMINATED.

WELL, MY OTHER QUESTION IS, I MEAN, YOU SEE THAT THE PROPERTY IS DIVIDED INTO TWO DIFFERENT ZONES.

THAT'S CORRECT. RIGHT. ONE OF THEM BEING SF THREE, WHICH IS ONE ACRE MINIMUM.

UNDERSTAND. SO WHY DID YOU GO FAR BEYOND THAT AND PRESENT SOMETHING THAT'S 7000FT² INSTEAD OF ONE ACRE? THAT WAS FROM ORIGINAL DRAFTS BACK WHEN WE HAD THE 150 LOT DENSITY AND OBVIOUSLY SHRUNK DOWN TO 113 WHERE IT IS TODAY. SO THAT WAS THROUGH THE STAFF COMMENTS AND SUBMITTALS SINCE BEEN GOING ON SINCE MID-SUMMER.

OKAY. DID I UNDERSTAND THAT THE AVERAGE PRICE IS 775,000? THE AVERAGE SQUARE FOOT IS ABOUT 2500. YES, SIR.

SO $310 A SQUARE FOOT IS WHAT YOU THINK YOU CAN SELL A HOME FOR IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD? YES, SIR. WHICH PUTS IT SUBSTANTIALLY MORE THAN A LOT OF THE OTHER NEIGHBORHOODS IN SUNNYVALE THAT HAVE HALF ACRE AN ACRE.

LOTS. THOSE ARE THE PRICES IN THIS AREA. IT IS THE, YOU KNOW, DESIRE OF RESIDENTS TO HAVE A HOME WITH, WITH CLOSE NEIGHBORS WHERE THEY HAVE THE SENSE OF COMMUNITY, HAS THOSE ADDED AMENITIES OF THE PARK AND ALSO JUST THE.

WHERE DID YOU GET THAT THAT THAT INFORMATION THERE. BECAUSE THAT'S VERY DIFFERENT THAN WHAT I BELIEVE IS TRUE, AND WHAT I'M BEING TOLD BY PEOPLE IN THIS TOWN THAT HAVE BEEN CALLING ME OVER THE LAST SEVERAL DAYS, THAT HAVING A NEIGHBORHOOD WITH THAT HIGH CONCENTRATION OF HOUSES IS NOT WHAT THEY'RE LOOKING FOR.

SO TELL ME WHERE YOU GOT YOUR INFORMATION. WE'RE PULLING THAT DATA FROM NATIONAL REGISTRY LOCAL.

OUR OWN INTERNAL. WHAT ABOUT SUNNYVALE? SUNNYVALE HAS HAS CERTAIN COMMUNITIES THAT HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED HERE FOR MANY YEARS.

WE'VE GONE AND DRIVEN THAT LOOKED AT THEIR PARK FEATURES, THEIR ARCHITECTURE FEATURES.

[00:45:03]

WHO BUYS IN THAT NICHE? WHAT DOES IT LOOK LIKE FIVE YEARS FROM NOW IN THAT NICHE? BECAUSE THAT'S THAT'S A BIG CONCERN. I BELIEVE IT'S YOUNG FAMILIES, PEOPLE TRYING TO GET OUT OF DALLAS IN THE HECTIC THERE.

Y'ALL HAVE A VERY DESIRABLE TOWN, VERY DESIRABLE SCHOOL DISTRICT THAT'S DRIVING PEOPLE TO MOVE.

WE'VE GOT 70 PEOPLE MOVING TO DFW PER DAY. I WANT TO KNOW, YOU KNOW, THE QUESTION IS, HOW MANY, HOW MANY OF THOSE PEOPLE IS SUNNYVALE ATTRACTING? AND WHO WANTS TO MAYBE HAVE A JOB DOWNTOWN OR IN ROCKWALL AT ONE OF THE NEW MEDICAL FACILITIES OR SOMEWHERE AROUND HERE, BUT HAVE A PLACE WHERE THEY KNOW THEIR CHILDREN CAN GET A GOOD EDUCATION AND THEY'RE THEY'RE SAFE AT HOME AT NIGHT.

I'LL GO THE OTHER DIRECTION. WHAT'S THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF HOUSES THAT YOU COULD BUILD? COULD YOU GET BY WITH 50? 50 FOOT PRODUCT? NO, 50 HOUSES TOTAL INSTEAD OF 113.

NO. NO, SIR. THIS THIS SITE HAS SOME OFF SITE REQUIREMENTS OF BRINGING NEW WATER LINE IN, NEW SEWER LINE IN, ABANDONING ANOTHER. THERE'S ALSO A LOT OF GEOGRAPHIC FEATURES TO OVERCOME ON THIS AND GRADING DUE TO THE SLOPE TO THE FLOODPLAIN AND ECONOMICALLY IT IT CAN'T HANDLE THAT. IT CAN'T HANDLE WE THE THE THAT NUMBER OF 50 LOTS WOULD NOT WORK AT ALL FOR THIS PROJECT TO OCCUR.

NO. FOR FOR REALLY SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT TO OCCUR AT ALL.

OKAY. SO IF YOU YOU'RE ASKING FOR LET'S JUST SAY 113, I SAID 50.

WHAT WHAT'S THE MINIMUM AMOUNT. SURELY YOU HAVE THAT NUMBER IN YOUR HEAD THAT YOU DIDN'T COME THINKING THAT 113 WAS THE THE ONLY WAY YOU COULD DO IT? WHAT'S THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF HOUSES? I'M JUST CURIOUS. I MEAN, I MAY BE OFF BASE HERE ASKING THE QUESTION, BUT I'M JUST CURIOUS WHAT THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF HOUSES YOU COULD GET BY TO MAKE THIS HAPPEN AND, YOU KNOW, BE SUCCESSFUL. YEAH. AND MAKE THIS WORK FOR NOT ONLY THE RESIDENTS OF SUNNYVALE NOW, BUT THE PEOPLE THAT WOULD BE LOOKING TO MOVE INTO THIS IN THE FUTURE. AND WE WE LOOK, WE WANT TO BE PROUD OF WHAT WE DO AND WALK IT.

IN 20 YEARS, IF I'M STILL LIVING. THAT'S BEEN THE MY MARCHING ORDERS FROM WHATEVER CREATION STONEY CREEK WAS. AN EXAMPLE THAT WAS BROUGHT TO THE TOWN OF SUNNYVALE IN THE BEGINNING.

AND I WAS INVOLVED WITH THAT AT TIPTON ENGINEERING.

SO WHEN THAT WAS STARTED AND CREATED AND THE ACTIVITY AND HERE WE ARE, 40, 30 WHATEVER AMOUNT OF YEARS LATER.

AND THAT'S BEEN VERY SUCCESSFUL, SIMILAR TO LOT SIZES AND SO ON.

SO THIS IS THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY YOU KNOW, YOU HAVE THE THE UNFORTUNATELY THE TWO DISTRICTS THAT YOU'RE DEALING WITH ARE COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL, RIGHT ADJACENT TO IT. WE'RE WE'RE JUST TRYING TO ASSIMILATE, PROVIDE A COMPLETE RESIDENTIAL PD THAT WE STARTED OUT WITH MORE UNITS, AND WE WORKED WITH STAFF FOR SEVERAL MONTHS AND HAD COME BACK AND WE STARTED OUT WITH 70 FOOT LOTS OR 7000 SQUARE FOOT AND SO ON. SO STAFF KEPT PUSHING US AND RECOMMENDING LARGER LOTS AS FAR AS SIZING, AND THAT'S THE REASON WE ENDED UP WITH THE 80 FOOT PRODUCT.

80 BY ONE, 20, 90, 600FT² AND WORKS WITH AND WE WORK WITH THE FLOODPLAIN, WORK WITH THE CONNECTIVITY OF INTERSTATE THE SERVICE ROADS. SO WE'VE WE'VE COME TO A POINT AND I KNOW YOU, YOU YOU THINK YOU WANT TO COME TO COMMISSION WITH A LOT MORE THAN WHAT YOU ANTICIPATE GETTING? BUT WE'VE WE'VE ALREADY BEEN THROUGH THAT EXERCISE WITH STAFF AND WE'RE AT A POINT TO WHERE, FROM THE STANDPOINT OF BEING SUCCESSFUL, WE'VE GOT A GREAT BUILDER, WE'RE EXCITED, WE'VE GOT COMMITMENTS FROM THE BUILDER, BUT WE'RE AT A LIMITATION IN, IN REGARDS TO THE NUMBER OF UNITS.

SO AND AS YOU CAN SEE WITH THE PRODUCT AND WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO PROVIDE.

YEAH. AND IT'S, IT'S EXCLUSIVITY. IT'S, IT'S ONE NEIGHBORHOOD, BUT THERE'S NO INTERCONNECTION WITH OTHER PIECES AND PARTS AND OR CIRCULATION TO OTHER SUBDIVISIONS. SO WE'RE TYING INTO 80 IT'S EXCLUSIVE AND IT'S A GREAT GREAT ASSET FOR MY HUMBLE OPINION TO THE TOWN OF SUNNYVALE.

SO AND WE'RE HERE TONIGHT TO TALK ABOUT IT AND SPECIFICALLY AND HOPEFULLY YOUR COMMISSION TO SUPPORT.

[00:50:05]

THAT'S ALL I'M TRYING TO DO. I'M JUST TRYING TO. IF IF YOU IF YOU CAN'T GET 113 BECAUSE IT JUST DOESN'T WORK OR IT DOESN'T FIT, SUNNYVALE DOESN'T FIT WHAT WE HAVE CURRENTLY AND WHAT WE'VE WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR IN THE FUTURE.

WHAT CAN YOU HELP US GET TO, YOU KNOW, IF IT IF IT.

THAT'S WHY I'M JUST TRYING TO ASK THE QUESTION. I MEAN, I'LL LEAVE IT AT THAT. ACTORS THAT WE CAN'T NEGOTIATE LIVE UP HERE OBVIOUSLY I GET IT.

THAT'S, YOU KNOW, PURCHASE PRICE, OFF SITE ENGINEERING COST.

WHAT THOSE WATER PIPE REGULATIONS, SEWER PIPE REGULATIONS ARE AND WHAT THOSE COSTS ARE.

WE'RE NOT ASKING FOR ANY REIMBURSEMENTS ON THOSE.

WE'RE NOT ASKING FOR ANY WAIVING OF IMPACT FEES OR OTHER FEES THAT, YOU KNOW, ARE ARE ON THE SUNNYVALE SIDE OF THIS, YOU KNOW, AGREEMENT. AND SO I WOULD SAY IF YOU YOU'RE LOOKING FOR A, A NUMBER ANSWER, I DON'T I DON'T HAVE IT TODAY BECAUSE I'VE GOT TO GO BACK AND TALK TO HIM AS THE DEVELOPER. I'VE GOT TO GO TALK TO THE LANDOWNER, AND WE'VE GOT TO GO FIGURE THOSE THINGS OUT.

IF THERE IS A NUMBER IN YOUR HEAD BETWEEN 50 AND 113, IT'S GOT TO BE A LOT CLOSER TO 113 FOR THIS TO PENCIL OUT.

AND THAT'S BECAUSE OF WHERE WE'VE COME FROM, 150, 150 LOTS DOWN TO 120 TO 113.

AND I WOULD ALSO SAY THAT THE PD A PART OF THE PACKET TONIGHT.

SAYS 70 FOOT LOTS. THAT'S 80 FOOT LOT MINIMUM.

SO THAT'S A THAT WOULD NEED TO BE CHANGED IN THAT PD DOCUMENT THERE 80 BY 120.

LOOK, LOOK, I, I BELIEVE IN BEING ABSOLUTELY UPFRONT AND HONEST WITH ANYBODY THAT PRESENTS HERE AND JUST TELL YOU THE MY THIS IS ONLY MY PERSONAL FEELING AT THIS POINT.

EVERYONE UP HERE HAS THEIR OWN OPINION. I UNDERSTAND I HAVE AN ISSUE WITH THIS FOR A NUMBER OF REASONS.

FIRST OF ALL I HAVE SEEN SIMILAR NEIGHBORHOODS WITH THE COMPRESSION DENSITY OF THE HOMES AS CLOSE TOGETHER AS WHAT WE'RE BEING PRESENTED, AS CLOSE AS TEN FEET APART. AND I'VE SEEN INVESTORS COME IN AND SNAP UP THOSE NEIGHBORHOODS AND TURN THEM INTO RENTAL PROPERTIES.

THE NEXT THING YOU KNOW, THE PEOPLE THAT ARE LIVING THERE ARE NOT TAKING CARE OF THE PROPERTY AND IT BECOMES AN EYESORE.

AND THAT IS A HUGE CONCERN. AND IT'S A CONCERN OF THE PEOPLE WHO LIVE AROUND THAT.

THE INCREASED TRAFFIC ALONG AN ACCESS ROAD ON AN INTERSTATE RIGHT NOW THAT IS ALREADY IMPOSSIBLE TO GET DOWN DURING PEAK TRAFFIC TIMES MAKES IT ANOTHER ISSUE. I AM NOT FOR THIS.

ALSO, BECAUSE I'M. WE LIVE IN A TOWN RIGHT NOW THAT IS HEAVILY SLANTED TOWARD WANTING THIS TO REMAIN A RURAL COMMUNITY. EVERYONE IN THIS TOWN WOULD LOVE FOR THE DOOR TO HAVE SHUT AFTER WE MOVED IN, AND NO MORE PEOPLE MOVE IN.

ALL RIGHT, BUT THAT JUST DOESN'T HAPPEN. BUT BY THE SAME TOKEN, WE DON'T WANT TO TURN THIS INTO FORNEY.

AND MY DAUGHTER RIGHT NOW LIVES IN A NEIGHBORHOOD THAT IS VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT YOU'RE PROPOSING.

AND IT IS A DISASTER. IT REALLY IS. IT'S A DISASTER.

I QUESTION WHETHER THESE HOMES ARE GOING TO BE $310 A SQUARE FOOT SELLABLE WITH TEN FEET BETWEEN HOMES, AS PROPOSED HERE, OR EVEN 15FT. I DON'T THINK YOU CAN GET THAT PRICE FOR THOSE HOMES.

SO THE ONLY THING THAT CAN HAPPEN THEN IS TO SCALE DOWN THE QUALITY OF THE HOMES AND THE MATERIALS.

AND THE NEXT THING YOU KNOW, WE'VE GOT A NEIGHBORHOOD THAT WE'RE NOT GOING TO BE PROUD OF.

I AM VERY CONCERNED ALSO ABOUT THE IMPACT THIS WILL HAVE ON OUR SCHOOLS BECAUSE WE ARE FILLED WITH CLASSROOMS RIGHT NOW, AND NOW WE'RE TALKING ABOUT 100 HOMES WITH A FEW HUNDRED KIDS COMING IN.

AND LOOK, WE ALL LOVE KIDS. AND AS OUR OLDER CHILDREN AGE OUT OF HIGH SCHOOL, THERE IS A REAL CONCERN THAT WE DO NEED YOUNG KIDS COMING IN, BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE WE GET OUR FUNDING FOR OUR SCHOOLS, AND I'M VERY AWARE OF THAT.

SO WE DO NEED YOUNG FAMILIES MOVING IN, BUT DO WE NEED THEM LIVING TEN FEET APART WITH THE CARS PARKED IN THE STREETS, EVEN THOUGH IT SAYS YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO PARK IN YOUR DRIVEWAY? DO WE NEED ALL THE ISSUES THAT WE HAVE WITH INVESTOR COMMUNITIES, WITH RENTALS AND TRANSIENT FAMILIES? AND AND I WOULD SAY THAT IS THE LAST THING I WANT TO PUT MY NAME ON.

AND I'M JUST BEING BRUTALLY HONEST WITH YOU. AND I THINK THAT'S WHERE BRONSON IS COMING FROM.

AND I GET THAT YOU HAVE TO MONETIZE YOUR INVESTMENT.

I COMPLETELY I'M IN BUSINESS. I UNDERSTAND THERE'S A BREAK EVEN POINT WHERE IT JUST DOESN'T MAKE SENSE ANYMORE.

AND, GUYS, I'M TELLING YOU, THIS DOESN'T MAKE SENSE FINANCIALLY.

FOR US, IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO PACK 113 HOMES IN THAT PIECE OF LAND.

I MEAN, THE RENDERING LOOK LIKE A SLICE OF HEAVEN WITH THOSE TWO HOMES AND THE THE TENNIS COURT.

MY GOSH, WHO WOULDN'T WANT TO LIVE IN THAT? BUT THAT'S NOT REALITY.

THE REALITY IS YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE PEOPLE LIVING SHOULDER TO SHOULDER ON CROWDED STREETS, AND THAT IS NOT WHAT SUNNYVALE IS ABOUT. THAT'S JUST MY PERSONAL OPINION.

[00:55:01]

I HAVE ONE SECOND TO TALK TO MY COLLEAGUE HERE.

WE'D LIKE TO HEAR THE REST OF THE COMMISSION COMMENT.

SURE. PUBLIC INPUT. AND WE DON'T WANT TO GIVE UP.

ABSOLUTELY. AND THAT THAT'S A GREAT STATEMENT.

I THINK YOU CAN HEAR THE COMMENTS NOT ONLY HERE, BUT I DON'T THINK THESE PEOPLE SHOWED UP TONIGHT TO SAY HELLO TO ME.

I THINK THEY HAVE STRONG EMOTIONAL FEELINGS ABOUT WHAT I JUST SAID.

AND IF YOU DECIDE THAT. HEY, YOU KNOW WHAT? WE'D LIKE TO TAKE A LITTLE TIME.

THINK ABOUT THIS. COME BACK TO STAFF, LET US DO OUR DUE DILIGENCE, AND COME BACK WITH A PLAN THAT MIGHT MORE CLOSELY FIT WHAT WE'RE HEARING TONIGHT.

I THINK THAT'S A REALLY SMART MOVE. LET'S GET EVERYBODY'S FEEDBACK.

YEAH, AND INPUT. AND WE'D LIKE TO HEAR THE FEEDBACK FROM ALL THE COMMISSIONERS AND RESIDENTS AND THEN GET A CONTINUANCE OR TABLE IT.

SURE. MY LAST COMMENT IS THAT WE'RE CURRENTLY WE JUST SAW SOMETHING GO THROUGH OUR DESK.

THE LAST PHASE OF HOMESTEAD, SAME ISSUE WITH UTILITIES.

AND THEY HAD TO GO BACK UP TO ONE ACRE LOTS BECAUSE THEY WERE ALLOWED TO HAVE SEPTIC ON THEIR PROPERTIES.

THAT AVOIDED A LOT OF COSTS. SO NEXT DOOR IS SF THREE, WHICH IS MINIMUM ONE ACRE LOTS.

SO I FEEL LIKE THAT'S GOING TO BE WHERE EVERYBODY STANDS.

THAT'S MY COMMENT. SURE. AND AND WE WOULD LIKE THIS PD TO ALLOW FOR MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM RESTRICTIONS.

SO YOU KNOW MINIMUM YOU WANT 100% MASONRY REQUIREMENT ON THE HOUSE.

THAT'S GOING TO UP THE VALUE OF THE HOUSE. THERE'S NOT GOING TO BE SIDING OR, YOU KNOW, CLAPBOARD OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.

AND AND THEN AS FAR AS DENSITY GOES AND FIGURING THAT OUT, THERE'S, THERE'LL, THERE'LL BE AN EQUATION THAT MAKES SENSE FOR WHAT THE OFFSETS ARE, WHAT THE ONSITE WORK IS GRADING, AND THEN HOW WE CAN MAKE THAT WORK.

AND WE'LL WE'LL DO OUR BEST TO SHARE THAT WITH YOU GUYS AS WE WORK THROUGH WITH STAFF OVER THE NEXT FEW WEEKS.

I WOULD JUST SAY THIS DON'T TAKE AWAY FROM THIS MESSAGE THAT WE DON'T LIKE YOU.

WE DON'T WANT YOU TO PARTY SUNNYVALE. WE WANT QUALITY PRODUCT IN SUNNYVALE.

WE WANT QUALITY PEOPLE TO BUILD THOSE. AND I DON'T THINK THAT YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS AS A PERMANENT NO.

I THINK IT'S A K-N-O-W. WE NEED TO KNOW MORE ABOUT WHAT YOU CAN DO WITH LESS.

LOTS AND FEWER LOTS AND A HIGH QUALITY PRODUCT.

NO CLAPBOARD, NO SIDING. GIVE US A QUALITY PRODUCT.

IF YOU DRIVE AROUND SOME OF THE NEWER NEIGHBORHOODS, YOU'LL SEE WHAT SUNNYVALE HAS EXPECTED OVER THE LAST 5 TO 10 YEARS.

AND I DON'T THINK YOU'RE GOING TO SEE WHAT YOU'VE PROPOSED TONIGHT.

SO THAT'S MY CHALLENGE TO YOU. AND WHATEVER TIME YOU NEED TO TAKE REALLY GET TO KNOW SUNNYVALE AND GET A FEEL FOR WHAT WE EXPECT HERE.

WE'RE TRYING TO PREVENT SUNNYVALE FROM BECOMING, LIKE SOME OF OUR NEIGHBOR TOWNS.

HONESTLY ONE OF THE REASONS THAT I MOVED HERE WAS BECAUSE IT WAS DIFFERENT.

ONE OF THE REASONS PEOPLE MOVE HERE TO SEND THEIR KIDS TO SCHOOL IS BECAUSE THE SCHOOL IS DIFFERENT.

WE DON'T WANT TO DETERIORATE THAT. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? YES, SIR. OKAY. DO YOU HAVE ANY OTHER THINGS TO SAY BEFORE WE ALLOW THE PUBLIC TO MAKE COMMENTS? IF THEY'D LIKE TO? MAYBE THEY PRCHAL HAVE ANY DIRECT QUESTIONS.

I THINK WE'RE GOOD AT THIS POINT. OKAY, SO MY LAST QUESTION WOULD BE WOULD THE COMMISSIONERS BE OPEN TO FOR US TO REACH OUT VIA EMAIL OR PHONE CALL TO DISCUSS INDIVIDUAL THOUGHTS AND OPINIONS? I DON'T KNOW WHAT OUR RULES ARE ON THAT, ARE WE? I RECOMMEND DOING THAT THROUGH THROUGH STAFF, CITY STAFF, AND IF ANYTHING NEEDS TO BE BROUGHT BACK TO THE COMMISSION, THEN WE'LL WE'LL COORDINATE THAT. WE'RE PRETTY GOOD ABOUT RESPONDING TO. BUT WE'RE SCARED OF HER.

I'VE MET WITH HER A FEW TIMES. SHE SEEMS PRETTY TERRIFYING, I'M TELLING YOU.

YEAH. OTHER MUNICIPALITIES. MUCH SCARIER. SEND THE QUESTIONS AND SHE'LL CIRCULATE THEM TO US AND WE'LL ANSWER.

THANK YOU. ALRIGHT. OKAY. NOW, IF IF ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE HAS SOMETHING UNIQUE AND GOOD TO SAY THAT YOU THINK WE HAVEN'T COVERED, YOU'LL NEED TO FILL OUT A CARD AND THEN HAND THAT TO STAFF.

WE DO HAVE SOME FOLKS HERE WHO HAVE FILL OUT CARDS.

I WILL CALL YOUR NAME. AND IF YOU FEEL LIKE THERE'S SOMETHING DIFFERENT THAT YOU WANT TO BRING OUT, THAT'S FINE. SCOTT SEARCY, ARE YOU HERE? OKAY.

SCOTT. GOOD EVENING. HOW YOU DOING? FINE. I'M NOT GOING TO SAY NOTHING, JERRY, BECAUSE YOU SAID SO MUCH WHAT I ALREADY BELIEVE.

BUT I SPENT ALL DAY WRITING THIS. WELL, I DON'T WANT YOU TO WASTE YOUR TIME, SCOTT.

[01:00:05]

ON SPEAKER TONIGHT, IN OPPOSITION OF THE REZONING REQUEST OF THE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY ALONG HIGHWAY 80.

IT'S ALL BEEN SPEAKING ABOUT. THIS REQUEST GOES AGAINST THE TOWN'S VERY OWN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

I LOOKED IT UP. THE TOWN COUNCIL AND OTHER CITIZENS WORKED TIRELESSLY TO COME UP WITH THIS PLAN FOR THE DIRECTION WE WANTED SUNNYVALE TO GO IN NOT ONLY LOOK LIKE, BUT A TOWN LIKE NO OTHER AROUND TO LIVE IN.

I'M SURE THAT NOT EVERYONE AGREES WITH THIS PLAN, AND SOME MAY NOT CARE, BUT THE VERY FIRST GOAL OF THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WAS TO PRESERVE SUNNYVALE'S SMALL TOWN CHARACTER. THAT'S THE FIRST GOAL.

I BELIEVE THAT MOST RESIDENTS WISH TO KEEP THAT GOAL.

PUTTING THIS KIND OF HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ON THIS PROPERTY DOES NOT FIT WITH THAT GOAL.

I HEARD IT WAS 124 HOMES. NOW HE'S DOWN TO I DON'T KNOW WHAT HE'S DOWN TO 7090 600 HUNDRED ACRE, OR 9600FT² WHEN HE GETS TO FOUR 43,560. I'M ON BOARD, BUT I DON'T THINK HE'S GOING TO BE ABLE TO DO THAT.

WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT IS 124 HOMES ON 50 ACRES, WITH VERY FEW ELEVATION OPTIONS TO CHOOSE FROM, SEPARATED BY TEN FEET, SIDE BY SIDE, ROW AFTER ROW AFTER ROW AFTER ROW.

THIS REQUEST GOES AGAINST WHAT MOST RESIDENTS IN SUNNYVALE HAS FOUGHT SO HARD FOR MANY, MANY YEARS.

I HAVE FOUGHT AGAINST THIS FOR 26 YEARS. I'M AN OLD TIME RESIDENT.

I LIVE ON THE SUN STREETS. THAT'S WHAT THIS NEIGHBORHOOD SHOULD LOOK LIKE.

THOSE HOUSES ARE STILL GORGEOUS. THEY STILL LOOK GREAT.

THE SIDES THAT HAVE BEEN PROMISED OVER AND OVER AGAIN BY THE EVERY COUNCIL I HAVE KNOWN FOR THE PAST 25 YEARS THAT THEY THEMSELVES WOULD FIGHT TO KEEP AS THE ONE ACRE LOTS, EVERY ONE OF THEM GOING ALL THE WAY BACK TO MOSES.

AND I KNOW TIMES CHANGE AND PLANS CHANGE. CHANGED.

THEY'VE BEEN APPROVED FOR SMALLER. WE WE GOT CREEKSIDE AND ALL THAT.

BUT YOU CAN ASK MOST RESIDENTS AND YOURSELVES WHAT THEY LIKE MOST ABOUT SUNNYVALE, AND YOU MAY GET AN ANSWER, SOMETHING LIKE THIS. WE LOVE THAT. AS WE DRIVE THROUGH SUNNYVALE, WE DO NOT SEE CONCRETE ON EVERY SQUARE INCH.

I WAS COMING UP HERE TONIGHT DRIVING DOWN TRIP ROAD GOING AROUND.

THAT'S CURVE BY THE BY THE PARK. IT LOOKED LIKE HE WAS IN THE COUNTRY.

THIS REQUEST IS NOTHING BUT PUT STRAIN ON THE RESOURCES WE HAVE, WHICH, BY THE WAY, ARE STRAINED ENOUGH.

FROM POLICE TO SCHOOLS TO WATER TO STREET REPAIRS.

AND I WILL NOT EVEN MENTION OUR SMALL TOWN FIRE DEPARTMENT.

I BELIEVE JUST IN SPEAKING OF OUR SCHOOLS ALONE, THEY CANNOT HANDLE THIS KIND OF GROWTH.

THAT IS DESIGN 124 LOTS ON THIS SIDE OF THE PROPERTY COULD ADD OVER 200 CHILDREN TO EXISTING SCHOOLS.

SCHOOLS THAT I AM TOLD ARE AT NEAR CAPACITY ALREADY.

IN CLOSING, THIS PROPERTY WAS DEDICATED FOR COMMERCIAL FOR A REASON.

IT CAN HAVE ACCESS OFF OF 80 WHICH MAKES IT PERFECT FOR COMMERCIAL.

I WISH IT'D CHANGE IT TO RETAIL, NOT RESIDENTIAL.

TO TAKE ANY COMMERCIAL LAND OFF THE TABLE FOR OUR TOWN WOULD NOT BE WISE.

WE HAVE VERY LITTLE OF IT. I WOULD HOPE BY LEAVING ALL THE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY OR CHANGE IT TO RETAIL THAT WE HAVE, THAT WOULD HELP TAKE SOME OF THE TAX BURDEN OFF THE BACKS OF THE HOMEOWNERS.

IF THIS REQUEST IS GRANTED, I WOULD PRAY THAT IT IS CHANGED AT LEAST 1 TO 1 AND A HALF ACRE.

LOTS. THANK YOU. THANKS, SCOTT. BARB ROGERS, ARE YOU MISTER CHAIR, WISH TO SPEAK? MISTER CHAIRMAN, BEFORE WE PROCEED FORWARD, I DON'T KNOW IF I HEARD US OFFICIALLY OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING IF I'M INCORRECT THIS REGARD, BUT IF I DID, DID I NOT? I SAID WE'RE GOING TO.

I DIDN'T SAY A TIME. I'M SORRY. ALL RIGHT. WHAT? NO, NO, PLEASE. NO! SCOTT, YOU DID GOOD. YOU KEPT IT RIGHT UNDER THREE MINUTES.

ALRIGHT, WELL, I'M OFFICIALLY OPENING PUBLIC COMMENTS AT.

WE'LL CALL IT 7:07 P.M.. ALRIGHT, BARB. YOU'RE UP.

EUROPE. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU FOR GIVING US THIS TIME TO SPEAK.

I AM BARB ROGERS. I LIVE AT 632 EAST TRIPP ROAD.

I AM LESS THAN THREE MILES FROM THE PLANNED PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, AND I'VE BEEN IN SUNNYVALE FOR OVER 20 YEARS.

WE HAVE SIX ACRES. AND I HAVE TO SAY THAT, YOU KNOW, THE THE OPPOSITION DOES NOT COME IN CONCERN FOR THE QUALITY OF THE HOUSE. BUT WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT THAT SPACE IN SUNNYVALE, I'VE RIDDEN BY THERE ON MY BIKE FOR YEARS, UP AND DOWN. LAWSON. WATCH THE ASHLEY FURNITURE ASHLEY STOREHOUSES AND WAREHOUSES COME IN, AND THE 18 WHEELERS THAT ARE GOING UP AND DOWN LAWSON AND ARE GOING UP AND DOWN THAT NEWLY BUILT ROAD, AS WELL AS ON THE FEEDER ROAD TO 80. NONE OF OUR CYCLING BUDDIES WANT TO RIDE OUT THERE ANYMORE.

IT'S DANGEROUS. THE CONCERN IS THE NUMBER OF ROOFS.

IT'S NOT THE QUALITY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD ITSELF WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT THE LOCATION OF THAT NEIGHBORHOOD.

IT SOUNDS BEAUTIFUL, BUT IT IS IN ISOLATION. ALL OF THE OTHER NEIGHBORHOODS IN SUNNYVALE CONNECT TO EACH OTHER.

[01:05:05]

THERE'S A PATHWAY THAT LEADS INTO THAT NEIGHBORHOOD NEXT TO THOSE TWO PONDS THAT CONNECT TO COLLINS.

THERE IS NO WAY THAT I WILL BE ABLE TO WALK TO THAT NEIGHBORHOOD AS CLOSE AS I LIVE TO IT.

WHAT WILL HAPPEN IS YOU WILL HAVE A NEIGHBORHOOD THAT IS OUT IN NO MAN'S LAND, AND YOU WILL HAVE THE RISK OF RENTERS.

YOU WILL HAVE THE RISK OF CORPORATE DEVELOPERS WANTING TO BUY UP THOSE HOMES AND HAVE THEM AS A MORE TRANSIENT TYPE OF NEIGHBORHOOD, AS OPPOSED TO FAMILIES THAT WANT TO MAKE THEIR NAME HERE IN SUNNYVALE.

AND SO I'M VERY PROUD OF THE FACT THAT WE HAVE A RURAL COMMUNITY SO CLOSE TO THE METROPLEX, SO CLOSE TO REALLY GOOD MEDICAL CARE, SO CLOSE TO A VARIETY OF SCHOOLS IN ADDITION TO SUNNYVALE SCHOOL.

I KNOW THAT OUR TRAFFIC PLAN, THE MOBILITY STUDY, WAS DONE RECENTLY.

I THINK IT WAS IN JANUARY. IT WAS PUBLISHED, OR PERHAPS LAST YEAR.

IT HAS BEEN MANY YEARS SINCE THAT WAS DONE. I DON'T THINK THAT TAKES THIS NEW PROPOSAL INTO ACCOUNT IN TERMS OF THE NUMBER OF ROOFS.

THE TRAFFIC ON 80 IS ABYSMAL AND TONGUE IN CHEEK.

WE DO CALL OUR ASPECT OF SUNNYVALE DOWN THERE, WHERE MOST OF THE RANCHETTES STILL ARE.

AS THE LOSS BOTTOMS OF SUNNYVALE REGULARLY, YOU WILL SEE MATTRESSES BEING DUMPED.

YOU WILL SEE THE WORST I'VE SEEN IS A WHIRLPOOL MOTOR BEING DUMPED ON THE SIDE OF REBECCA.

AND IT IS A RISK IN BEING AT THE EDGE AND LESS MONITORED THAN THE CORE OF SUNNYVALE.

AND A LOT OF OUR NEIGHBORS AND OURSELVES HAVE TAKEN IT UPON OURSELVES TO KIND OF BE GOOD STEWARDS OF THAT AREA.

I THINK THIS NEIGHBORHOOD IS GOOD IN THEORY, BUT I DON'T THINK IT FITS WITH SUNNYVALE'S PLAN.

AND OF NOTE, YOUR LAST FIVE YEAR PLANS MENTIONED THE RURAL COMMUNITY FEEL YOUR MOST RECENT ANNUAL PLAN IN 2024.

AT THE END OF 24 MENTIONED RURAL IN THE FIRST STRATEGIC ITEM SIX TIMES AND RURAL COMMUNITY.

AND I WOULD ASK THAT OUR COUNCIL IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU ALREADY ARE BE GOOD STEWARDS OF THE ORIGINAL INTENT OF SUNNYVALE.

THANK YOU. THAT'S ALL. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. JAMIE, I BELIEVE IS JANET.

CHECK. IS AM I PRONOUNCING THAT CORRECT? OKAY.

DO YOU STILL WANT TO SPEAK? OKAY. THANK YOU. MICHAEL JANICEK, DO YOU STILL WANT TO SPEAK? THANK YOU. MICHAEL. KEN DAVIS. ALL RIGHT, SIR? MEGAN MCKAY. I PROMISED I WOULDN'T TALK, SO JUST IN OPPOSITION.

JERRY. NOTHING YOU HAVEN'T SAID. MEGAN. YOU'RE MY NEW BEST FRIEND.

NO. EDMUND MARTINEZ. OKAY. MY NAME IS EDWARD MARTINEZ. WE OWN THE PROPERTY. MY FATHER OWNS THE PROPERTY.

TINO MARTINEZ. I LIVE ON LARKIN I'VE THREE, THREE, FOUR SOUTH LARKIN.

MY DAD LIVES ON TRIPP ROAD. WE LIVED IN SUNNYVALE FOR A VERY LONG TIME.

I HAVE THREE GIRLS THAT GO TO SUNNYVALE, SUNNYVALE HIGH SCHOOL, MIDDLE SCHOOL, AND THE ELEMENTARY.

SO ALL THE BASES ARE COVERED. AND WELL, YOU KNOW, BASICALLY, YOU KNOW, I SEE A LOT OF OPPOSITION TOWARDS THE, THE, THE THE PROPOSED, THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.

AND IT'S KIND OF WEIRD. FIVE YEARS AGO, A DIFFERENT DEVELOPER CAME IN, SHOT IT DOWN FROM FOR DIFFERENT REASONS. IT DIDN'T FIT OUR MOLD BACK THEN.

AND IT WAS A MULTIFAMILY, SAME TYPE OF DEAL. A COUPLE YEARS AGO COMMERCIAL, I MEAN, WELL, THEY TRY TO DO BUILDINGS YOU KNOW, BUILDINGS, SOME DUDE WITH COMMERCIAL.

AND Y'ALL DIDN'T APPROVE IT EITHER. OKAY, SO I KNOW IT'S ZONED SINGLE FAMILY HOME, BUT IT'S THE WAY THE PROPERTY IS. IT'S KIND OF A WEIRD, WEIRD PROPERTY.

AND ON THE OTHER SIDE, IT'S SEWN HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL.

MY QUESTION IS, HOW DO WE COMMERCIAL? YOU KNOW, PEOPLE RATHER HAVE, YOU KNOW, LIKE SOMEONE SAID YOU KNOW, LIKE A STORAGE UNIT PLACE, LIKE A U-HAUL PLACE OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.

THEN HOUSES. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE WHY THE TOWN OF SUNNYVALE IS SO AGAINST THAT.

ANYTHING THAT GETS DONE ON THAT PROPERTY. I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT Y'ALL.

I'M. THERE'S NO WAY I'M TALKING, YOU KNOW, SOME OF THE RESIDENTS, I DON'T I WANT TO UNDERSTAND KIND OF WHAT WHAT DO Y'ALL WANT TO SEE ON THAT PROPERTY.

BECAUSE WE DON'T WANT TO WASTE OUR TIME. WE DON'T WANT TO WASTE OUR MONEY.

WE DON'T WANT TO WASTE THESE PEOPLE'S TIMES OR THEIR FINANCIAL STAKE THAT THEY HAVE INTO IT.

I DON'T. I WOULD LIKE TO MAYBE SEE WHAT Y'ALL WANT TO SEE ON THAT PROPERTY.

[01:10:02]

YOU KNOW, BRICK STONE CONFORMS TO SOME OF THE NICE HOUSES THAT HERE, HERE IN SUNNYVALE, I SEE A LOT OF A LOT OF DEVELOPMENT GOING ON IN SUNNYVALE, A LOT OF HOUSES BEING BUILT. SO THERE'S NEW FAMILIES COMING IN OFF OF TOWN EAST.

I JUST DROVE BY THERE, ADDING TO, I GUESS, NEW NEIGHBORHOODS OVER THERE, BECAUSE I SEE A LOT OF LAND CLEARING RIGHT THERE BEFORE YOU GET TO TOWN EAST.

SO THERE'S MORE HOUSES COMING INTO INTO SUNNYVALE.

I AS FAR AS THE BURDEN ON THE SCHOOL DISTRICT, YOU KNOW, WE JUST PASSED A BOND AND THIS IS GOING TO MAKE THE SCHOOLS BIGGER.

YOU KNOW, IT'S GOING TO ENLARGE THE SCHOOLS. IT'S GOING TO DO EVERYTHING THAT OUR STUDENTS NEED.

SO I WOULD REALLY LIKE TO SEE OR MAYBE GET AN OPINION FROM SOMEBODY.

WHAT DO PEOPLE WANT TO SEE ON THAT PROPERTY AT US AS A PROPERTY OWNER, I THINK WE SHOULD I DON'T KNOW WHAT RIGHTS WE HAVE.

WHO KNOWS? YOU KNOW BUT IT'S KIND OF FRUSTRATING THAT WE ARE AT THE MERCY OF EVERYBODY. EVERYBODY. YOU KNOW, IT'S WHEN IT COMES TO THAT, YOU KNOW, LIKE I SAID, IT'S I DON'T KNOW IF Y'ALL ARE ON THE BOARD.

TWO YEARS AGO, THREE YEARS AGO, WHEN THEY TRIED TO DO SOMETHING. I DON'T KNOW IF Y'ALL WERE ON THAT SAME BOARD OR NOT, BUT WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE AS FAR AS SOMETHING ON THAT PROPERTY? ON THAT PROPERTY? I MEAN, THAT'S I THINK IT'S A FAIR QUESTION, YOU KNOW.

YOU KNOW, IT'S AND I'LL BACK UP MY HOUSE BACKS UP TO THAT PROPERTY.

WE HAVE OVER ALMOST 300 ACRES AROUND THERE, AND MOST OF IT'S OF COURSE, WE HAVE A RODEO RANCH.

YOU KNOW, WE WE DO RODEO BUSINESS AND WE RUN A LOT OF COWS ON THERE, AND THAT COWS ARE STILL GOING TO RUN ON THERE WHERE THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO ON THE, ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THAT. SO, YOU KNOW, IT'S JUST A QUESTION.

SHORT COMMENT. THE DEVELOPMENT THAT YOU SEE ON TOWNEES WAS THE ONE I WAS REFERRING TO WHERE THEY WANTED MORE HOUSES, BUT THEY ENDED UP WITH LESS HOUSES TO GO TO ONE ACRE LOTS FOR THE SEPTIC ISSUE FOR UTILITIES, I THINK JUST TO MAKE IT QUICK. SF3 IS ONE ACRE MINIMUM I BELIEVE ALL COUNTY OR SUNNYVILLE ONCE ONE ACRE MINIMUM. ALL RIGHT. THANKS A LOT. APPRECIATE IT.

OKAY, OKAY. NEXT UP IS ZACH WILLIAMS. DO YOU STILL WANT TO SPEAK? HEY, EVERYBODY. STATE YOUR NAME, PLEASE. I LIVE AT 537 LARKIN, RIGHT NEXT DOOR TO MR. MARTINEZ. SO MY PROPERTY BACKS UP TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.

ALSO I'VE GOT A COUPLE THINGS. I GREW UP IN THE CONCRETE BUSINESS, AND I'VE BEEN IN THE LUMBER AND TRUST BUSINESS FOR 12 YEARS. WHEN I FIRST GOT STARTED, MY BEST CUSTOMER WAS HISTORY MAKER HOMES.

SO I SOLD THEM WALL PANELS, FLOOR TRUSSES AND ROOF TRUSSES FOR ABOUT TWO YEARS.

AND THE PICTURES I'M SEEING UP THERE THAT THEY'RE SHOWING DON'T LOOK LIKE 22 TO 2500 SQUARE FOOT HOMES.

I LIVE IN A 2200 SQUARE FOOT HOME IN FORNEY. WE JUST MOVED OUT OF THERE AND IT WENT FOR 300,000.

SO I DON'T KNOW HOW THEY'RE GOING TO COME OVER HERE. EVEN WITH A BETTER PRODUCT AT 2500FT² AND SELL IT FOR 753 HOUSES PER ACRE.

WE'RE SQUEEZING PEOPLE IN LIKE CRAZY. LIKE YOU SAID, YOUR DAUGHTER LIVING IN FORNEY.

I'VE BEEN THERE TEN YEARS. IT'S A NIGHTMARE. RIGHT.

AND COMPARE THAT TO THE 3500 SQUARE FOOT HOUSE I JUST BUILT.

I'M JUST TELLING YOU, THE PICTURES LOOK GREAT, BUT THAT'S NOT WHAT THEY'RE GOING TO BUILD. PERSONALLY.

SELFISHLY. MR. MARTINEZ. SORRY. I DON'T WANT TO LOOK AT ANYTHING.

I DON'T WANT TO GO OUT MY BACK DOOR IN MY BACKYARD AND SEE ANYTHING OVER THERE, MUCH LESS 120 HOUSES.

AND JUST TO TACK ON TO WHAT EVERYBODY ELSE SAID, THE TRAFFIC'S GOING TO BE HORRIBLE.

AND. ET CETERA. THAT'S ALL I GOT. THANKS A LOT.

APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENT. OKAY. RONALD ROBINSON, DO YOU STILL WISH TO SPEAK? OKAY. RONALD ROBINSON 616 AND SIX ONE FOR US HIGHWAY 80,

[01:15:03]

SO RIGHT NOW, I'M. I'M OPPOSED. THE CONCEPT PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THE EASEMENT OWNED BY RONALD ROBINSON SENIOR.

MY FATHER ON THEIR PROPERTY, WHICH WHERE THEY'RE NOT ALLOWED TO BUILD AT ALL BECAUSE OF THAT SEWER EASEMENT.

AND ALSO ABOUT A WEEK AGO, I ASKED IF IN ANY WAY AFFECTED MY PROPERTY, AND I WAS TOLD NO.

BUT THEN ON THE CONCEPT PLAN ON THE BOTTOM RIGHT CORNER, IT SHOWS THAT IT'S DOING SOMETHING AND IT'S DEFINITELY ON MY PROPERTY.

SO I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY WHAT THAT BOTTOM RIGHT CORNER WAS.

AND THE CONCEPT PLAN HAS TO SHOW MY EASEMENT AND MY FATHER'S EASEMENT ON THAT PROPERTY.

OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES, SIR. APPRECIATE IT.

OKAY. LAWRENCE BOYD, DO YOU STILL WISH TO SPEAK? LAWRENCE BOYD 613 US HIGHWAY 80. I'VE BEEN HERE 7877.

SO I'VE BEEN IN BUSINESS HERE FOR THE NEARLY 50 YEARS.

LIVED HERE SINCE 92. MY ONLY CONCERN IS, IS WE KEEP CONVERTING HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL TO SOMETHING OTHER THAN HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL.

IF YOU GO TO FROM TERRELL ON HIGHWAY 80 TO BUCKNER LOOP 12 ON HIGHWAY 80, AND ON 635, THERE IS HEB'S, THERE'S BUCKY'S, THERE'S ALL THESE DIFFERENT THINGS, THEN I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S ON RECORD, THAT IF YOU PUT A RESIDENTIAL THERE, YOU HAVE 190 COME, YOU HAVE THE EXPANSION OF 80.

YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE ALL THESE CARS POURING INTO WHERE THERE'S COMMERCIAL STUFF GOING ON.

I DON'T YOU'VE PROBABLY SEEN AROUND COLLINS AND THE SERVICE ROAD WHERE ALL THOSE WAREHOUSES ARE.

THEY'RE THERE WHEN I COME HOME AT NIGHT, 10:00 AT NIGHT, THERE'S CARS THERE.

SO MY ONLY CONCERN IS, IS THAT YOU PUT RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD THERE, AND THEY'RE GOING TO BE COMPLAINING.

THEY'RE GOING TO BE OPPOSING EVERY. DEVELOPMENT.

THAT'S HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL. PHIL, MR. MARTINEZ'S PAIN ABOUT THE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL.

I DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT HIS PROJECT, BUT I WOULD HATE TO SEE THE TOWN OF SUNNYVALE GIVE UP ANY MORE ANYMORE HIGHWAY, COMMERCIAL, BUSINESS, PROPERTY BECAUSE WE NEED THE TAX BASE.

AND ONE WAREHOUSE WILL COVER 113 HOUSES. SO THAT'S ALL I HAVE.

OKAY. THANK YOU. WE HAVE ONE COMMENT THAT WAS EMAILED, AND YES, THIS IS ON BEHALF OF HOLLY.

HOLLY GARLAND. SHE JUST GOT ELECTED AS COUNCILWOMAN.

HER ADDRESS IS 384 BETHANY ROAD. SHE IS IN OPPOSITION OF THE WOODLAND HILLS PLAN DEVELOPMENT.

SHE SAYS HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENTS LIKE THIS HAVE HARMED NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORING COMMUNITIES, LEADING TO OVERCROWDED SCHOOLS, DECREASED HOME VALUES AND LOSS OF COMMUNITY CHARACTER.

TO PROTECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE COUNT, I URGE YOU TO VOTE NO ON THIS DEVELOPMENT.

JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT GOT THROUGH OKAY.

ANY OTHER COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE THAT HAVEN'T BEEN MADE, OR SOMETHING UNIQUE AND DIFFERENT THAT YOU WANT TO PRESENT? YES, SIR. COME TO THE PODIUM. STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, PLEASE.

HI, I'M STEPHEN RAY. I LIVE AT 299 CRYSTAL COVE.

NOT A LOT TO ADD. I JUST WANTED TO LOOK AT IT THROUGH A DIFFERENT LENS AND SOME OF THE INCREASED NUMBERS.

SO WE'RE LOOKING AT A DENSITY INCREASE FROM WHAT WE HAVE CURRENTLY ZONED, WHICH WOULD BE 620.

IT'S PRETTY STAGGERING. I KNOW WE'VE TALKED A LOT ABOUT THE NUMBERS FROM 43,560 TO 7 TO 7000.

THE EASEMENTS IF I'M NOT IF CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, BUT GOING FROM FIVE FEET SETBACKS TO OR EXCUSE ME FROM 30FT TO 5FT, THAT'S INSANITY. THAT'S THAT'S THE A LOT OF WHAT I KNOW IT'S BEEN SAID, BUT EVERYONE HAS MOVED TO SUNNYVALE BECAUSE WE HAVE THESE AMAZING NEIGHBORHOODS THAT HAVE SPACE FOR US TO BREATHE AND LIVE ON AND FEEL LIKE WE'RE IN THE COUNTRY.

I KNOW I'M REPEATING A LOT OF WHAT'S BEEN SAID, BUT AND THEN ALSO, IF I'M CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, BUT THE MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE IS BEING INCREASED FROM 35% TO 65%.

SO NOT ONLY IS IT GETTING SMALLER, WE'RE COVERING THE ENTIRETY OF IT.

SO THERE'S YOU KNOW WHAT WHAT GREENERY, WHAT YARDS.

WHAT ARE WE GOING TO HAVE EVEN, YOU KNOW, FOR THE PEOPLE THAT THE CHILDREN THAT LIVE THERE BESIDES TO JUST PLAY OUT IN THE STREETS.

THAT'S IT. JUST WANT TO ADD A LITTLE EXTRA COLOR.

THANKS A LOT. APPRECIATE IT. ANY OTHER COMMENTS AT THE FROM THE AUDIENCE NEED TO BE MADE.

[01:20:03]

ANY DISCUSSION FROM THE COMMISSIONERS? YEAH, I'VE GOT A COUPLE COMMENTS.

WHEN I SAT DOWN HERE TONIGHT, I WROTE TWO THINGS ON MY PAPER.

I WROTE 50 AND I CIRCLED IT JUST, YOU KNOW, WHERE MY NUMBER 50 COMES FROM.

BUT I'M NOT SURE WE COULD EVEN GET TO 50 IF WE.

BECAUSE 50 WOULD BE OVER AN ACRE EACH. BECAUSE I SIT HERE AND I THINK ABOUT, YOU KNOW, I WAS APPOINTED TO THIS TO MAKE SURE THAT WE DO THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE AND, AND WE TAKE THE BEST CONSIDERATION FOR ALL OF SUNNYVALE.

AND I, I WROTE THE NOTE THAT THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE FOR A TRACK THAT'S DESIGNATED HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL IS NOT SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, PERIOD. AND AND WE LOOK AT THAT A SLIDE UP THERE THAT HAD SOME REAL FANCY TAX NUMBERS ON THERE.

AND I GET THAT AND I UNDERSTAND THAT. BUT ONE OF THE THINGS WE HAVE TO REALIZE IS THAT THEY DESIGNATED, YOU KNOW, ONCE YOU GO RESIDENTIAL THERE, IT NEVER GOES BACK.

NOTHING EVER CHANGES BACK TO THAT, NO MATTER WHAT COMES ALONG DOWN THE ROAD.

SO I WANT US TO REMEMBER THAT AS A, AS A COMMISSION THAT, YOU KNOW, IT'S IT'S WE'RE HERE TO SELECT THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE FOR THIS.

THANK YOU. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? ALL RIGHT. WITH NO OTHER COMMENTS.

DO I HAVE A MOTION FROM THE COMMISSION COMMISSIONER? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO NOT APPROVE TO DISAPPROVE.

CASE 11857Z WOODLAND HILLS PLAN DEVELOPMENT. ALL RIGHT.

MOTION MADE BY BRONSON BLACKSTON. DO I HAVE A SECOND? I SECOND. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF DENYING RAISE YOUR HAND, PLEASE.

ALL THOSE OPPOSED BY THE SAME SIGN. THE MOTION FAILS TO PASS.

I WANT TO SAY ONE THING. FIRST OF ALL, TO OUR VISITORS THAT CAME TONIGHT TO PRESENT.

I HOPE YOU LEAVE HERE WITH AN UNDERSTANDING THAT WITH THE BELIEF THAT YOU WERE TREATED WITH RESPECT AND FAIRLY, I HOPE YOU HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY AT SOME POINT TO COME BEFORE THIS COMMISSION AND BE SUCCESSFUL AND BUILD SOMETHING THAT WE'D ALL BE PROUD OF.

I DON'T WANT YOU TO THINK THAT THIS IS ANYTHING PERSONAL AGAINST YOU OR YOUR COMPANY.

BEING A RESIDENT OF SUNNYVALE MEANS SOMETHING TO US, AND WE ARE VERY PROTECTIVE OF SUNNYVALE.

THAT'S WHY WE ALL LIVE HERE. SO PLEASE ACCEPT OUR THANKS FOR BEING HERE, THE PROFESSIONALISM THAT YOU'VE SHOWN IN YOUR PRESENTATION, THE WORK THAT YOU'VE PUT INTO THIS, AND ALL I CAN SAY IS, I HOPE NEXT TIME WE'RE ABLE TO SAY YES.

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR BEING HERE.

ALL RIGHT. WE'LL MOVE ON NOW TO THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA.

NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA E-1, DISCUSS AND CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A FINAL PLAT FOR LOT ONE, BLOCK A SAGER FARMS ADDITION CONSISTING OF 16.39 ACRES

[E. Discussion and Action Items]

OUR FIRST PLAT FOR THIS EVENING IS A FINAL PLAT FOR SIX, 367 AND 371 COUNTIES BOULEVARD, WHICH IS NEAR THE THE NORTHWEST INTERSECTION OF TOWN EAST AND COLLINS ROAD.

IT'S ABOUT 16.39 ACRES. AND SO THE PURPOSE OF THIS FINAL PLAT IS TO TAKE TWO TRACKS OF LAND AND COMBINE THEM INTO ONE LOT.

SO A PRELIMINARY PLAT WAS APPROVED BY PNC ON NOVEMBER 20TH OF LAST YEAR, AND ON BY TOWN COUNCIL IN DECEMBER OF LAST YEAR.

AND SO THIS FINAL PLAT IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PREVIOUS THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT.

SO IT IT ADHERES TO ALL THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODES, THE UDO AND THE ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS.

THIS IS A MINISTERIAL FUNCTION OF THE TOWN, AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT.

ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS? ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION? ALL RIGHT. ARE THERE ANY COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC ON THIS TOPIC ONLY.

ANY COMMENTS THAT ANYONE WISHES TO MAKE? ALRIGHT.

SEEING NO ONE COME FORWARD WILL CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENTS.

ALL RIGHT COMMISSIONERS, ANY ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS? ALL RIGHT. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE MOTION OR THE CHANGE MOTION TO ACCEPT.

ALL RIGHT. LISA BURTON HAS MADE THE MOTION. I HAVE A SECOND.

I'LL SECOND. SECOND BY CARLEY. ALL RIGHT. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY RAISING YOUR HAND.

THOSE OPPOSED BY THE SAME SIGN. MOTION IS PASSED.

NEXT E TO DISCUSS AND CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A REPLAT.

LOTS ONE, R1 TWO AND THREE, BLOCK ONE GATEWAY PARK.

THIS IS COMMONLY KNOWN AS A GATEWAY PARK. REPLAT STAFF.

YOU WANT TO BRING US UP TO SPEED? YES, SIR. GOOD EVENING AGAIN.

THIS IS OBVIOUSLY PART OF THE GATEWAY PARK DEVELOPMENT.

AND SO THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPLAT IS TO CREATE THREE NEW LOTS OUT OF THE PREVIOUS LOT ONE.

[01:25:03]

YOU CAN SEE ON THE SCREEN THE TEAL CYAN COLOR ARE THE THE NEW LOTS AND THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED LOTS ARE THE YELLOW ABOVE.

THE GATEWAY PARK SUBDIVISION WAS APPROVED IN SEPTEMBER OF 2022, AND A REPLAT WAS APPROVED IN AUGUST OF 2024, WHICH CREATED THE CURRENT THE CONFIGURATION OF THE NORTH PORTION OF IT.

ALL DETAILS OF THE PLAT ADHERE TO THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE, THE UDO AND THE ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS.

AND AGAIN, THIS IS A MINISTERIAL FUNCTION AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PLAT.

ANY QUESTIONS? ANY QUESTIONS. ALL RIGHT. ANY COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE THAT YOU WISH TO MAKE.

ALRIGHT. SEEING NONE WE'LL CLOSE THAT OUT. LAST DISCUSSION.

ANYBODY ON THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY DISCUSSION? ALL RIGHT. DO I HAVE A MOTION? MOTION TO APPROVE.

OKAY, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. ALL RIGHT.

ANDREW HAS MADE THE MOTION TO ACCEPT A SECOND.

SECOND BY CALI. THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY RAISING YOUR HAND.

THOSE OPPOSED BY THE SAME SIGN. MOTION PASSES.

OKAY. NEXT TO DISCUSS AND CONSIDER APPROVAL OF.

OH, THAT WAS THE SAME ONE, WASN'T IT? SORRY. GOTTA TURN.

I GOT TURNED PAGE E3 DISCUSSING. CONSIDER MAKING RECOMMENDATION TOWN COUNCIL REGARDING A SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR A MULTI-TENANT RETAIL BUSINESS BUILDING ON APPROXIMATELY TWO AND A HALF ACRES.

THIS IS KNOWN AS THE VICTORY SUNNYVALE RETAIL SITE PLAN.

STAFF. THANK YOU. CHAIRMAN. GOOD EVENING AGAIN.

AND LAST BUT NOT THE LEAST, THIS IS THE SITE PLAN APPLICATION THAT TRIGGERED THE GATEWAY PARK PD AMENDMENT TO MAKE THE CONCEPT PLAN AND THE ZONING KIND OF JIVE WHICH ALLOWED THE SITE PLAN TO BE PROCESSED.

AND ALSO, YOU SAW THE REPLAT APPLICATION. SO THAT HIGHLIGHTED KIND OF WEIRD SHAPED PIECE OF PROPERTY ON THE MAP.

THAT'S THE CURRENTLY BEING REPLATTED AS LOT 1 OR 2.

SO ITS ADDRESS IS 3200 NORTH BELTLINE ROAD, PART OF GATEWAY PARK PD, ABOUT TWO AND A HALF ACRE SIZE OF THE LOT.

THE APPLICATION IS TO APPROVE A DETAILED SITE PLAN TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 19,000 SQUARE FOOT, MULTI-TENANT RETAIL RESTAURANT, SHELL BUILDING.

NO TENANT INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THIS POINT.

AS YOU SAW IN OUR STAFF REPORT, STAFF RECOMMEND THE APPLICANT CONTINUES TO IMPROVE THE BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN TO COMPLY AND CONFORM TO THE UDO AND THE OVERALL HEIGHT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS THAT IS TYPICAL OF THE GATEWAY PARK PD BEFORE THE SITE PLAN APPLICATION SHOULD BE APPROVED.

THIS IS THE SITE PLAN LAYOUT. ON YOUR SCREEN YOU CAN SEE THE BUILDING THE RECTANGULAR LOOKING BUILDING THAT'S ALIGNED FACING BELTLINE ROAD SURFACE PARKING MOSTLY LOCATED TOWARDS THE FRONT.

ALONG BELTLINE, THERE IS A ODD SHAPED JOG OF THE LOT OR THE SITE TOWARDS THE BACK.

WHERE IS ANOTHER ADDITIONAL ROW OF HIDDEN PARKING AT THE BACK.

THE SITE WILL BE ACCESSED THROUGH TWO SHARED DRIVEWAYS, ONE TO THE NORTHERN END AND ONE TO THE SOUTHERN END OF THE PROPERTY.

THE PROPOSED USE AND THAT'S THERE WAS A TYPO ON THE STAFF REPORT.

I WANTED TO POINT THAT OUT. SO THE USE OF THE TOTAL 19,000 SQUARE FOOT THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING, 9000 OF IT WOULD BE RESTAURANT USE AND 10,000 OF THE BUILDING WOULD BE FUTURE RETAIL USE.

SO THE RATIOS ARE DIFFERENT AND THEY DO MEET THE PARKING REQUIREMENT BASED ON THE PARKING RATIO.

SO THE ERROR IN THE STAFF REPORT WAS I BELIEVE I MISTYPED IN THE PROPOSED PARKING 60 INSTEAD OF 50, BUT IT IS 50. WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING ALONG BELTLINE ROAD, THEY'RE CONTINUING.

THEY'RE PROPOSING TO CONTINUE THE SIX FEET WIDE, MEANDERING CONCRETE SIDEWALK ALONG BELTLINE ROAD THAT WE RECENTLY SAW BEING CONSTRUCTED AS PART OF THE PROJECT, AS WELL AS THE C STORE AT THE INTERSECTION OF TOWN AND BELTLINE 25 FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS ALSO PROPOSED.

THESE ARE ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE GATEWAY PARK PLAN DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE.

TEN SHADE TREES ARE PROPOSED ALONG BELTLINE ROAD WITHIN THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER.

THEY ARE PROPOSING ABOUT 3900 SQUARE FOOT LANDSCAPE AREA WITHIN PARKING LOT ISLANDS.

THIS IS THE COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN. A SNAPSHOT OF THE COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN.

TWO THINGS TO POINT OUT AT THE TWO END CAP OF THE BUILDING.

THEY'RE PROPOSING TO SMALL OUTDOOR PATIO SPACE.

THE NORTHERN PORTION IS ABOUT 165 SQUARE FOOT IN AREA.

THE SOUTHERN PATIO IS SHOWN AS ABOUT 475 SQUARE FOOT PATIO AREA.

SO THE CONCEPT IS PROBABLY THE TWO END CAP. TENANTS WOULD BE FUTURE RESTAURANT TENANTS.

LOADING AND TRASH SERVICES ARE GOING TO BE LOCATED AT THE REAR SIDE OF THE BUILDING.

THAT'S IF YOU CAN TELL IT'S KIND OF SHADED IN A HASH SYMBOL AND THE TWO DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES OR THE TRASH RECEPTACLE.

[01:30:06]

AS DISCUSSED DURING THE PD AMENDMENT, APPLICATION PROCESS TO MULTI-TENANT MONUMENT SIGNS ARE PROPOSED AND ARE AS DIRECTED BY THE COMMISSION.

WE WILL BE RECEIVING MORE DETAILS BEFORE THIS CASE MOVES FORWARD TO COUNCIL FOR FINAL CONSIDERATION.

RIGHT NOW WE HAVE THE HEIGHT AND LENGTH AND SIZE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SIGNAGE OUTLINED.

THIS IS THE PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATION IN COLOR THAT THE APPLICANT HAS PROPOSED.

AND QUICK NOTE, BEFORE THIS MEETING, I WAS TALKING TO MY COLLEAGUE LAURA, AND I WAS LIKE, I'LL GIVE YOU ONE GUESS. TONIGHT WE HAVE ALL THESE APPLICATIONS.

I'M PRETTY ANXIOUS, BUT I'LL GIVE YOU ONE GUESS.

WHICH APPLICATION IS THE ONE THAT'S MAKING ME MOST ANXIOUS? AND SHE COULDN'T GUESS IT. IT WAS THIS ONE. SO I HAVE HAD A DIFFICULTY WITH THIS WORKING ON THIS BUILDING SITE PLAN REVIEW AND THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS.

KUDOS TO THE APPLICANT. THEY HAVE TRIED TO MEET ME IN THE MIDDLE.

HOWEVER, AS YOU SAW IN THE STAFF REPORT, I HAD LISTED SOME REQUIREMENTS OF OUR DESIGN STANDARDS.

HOW THE TRIPARTITE BUILDING ARCHITECTURAL STYLE AND JUST THE MONOTONOUS LOOK OF THE FACADE THAT'S FACING BELL LINE BECAUSE OUR YOU DO NOT ONLY HAVE SPECIAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS OR ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS, IT ALSO HAS ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDINGS THAT ARE ON BELL LINE CORRIDOR.

AND FROM BOTH ASPECTS, IT'S STAFF OPINION THAT THEY DO NOT MEET THOSE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS.

ON THE SECOND, SAY THAT AGAIN, STAFF BELIEVES WHAT ON STAFF OPINION IS ON BOTH ASPECTS, THE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDING BUILDINGS AS WELL AS COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS. THIS PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATION DOES NOT MEET THOSE STANDARDS.

ON THE SECOND SLIDE, I HAVE TRIED TO GIVE SOME EXAMPLES WHICH I HAD ALSO GIVE SOME SIMILAR EXAMPLES TO THE APPLICANT DURING STAFF REVIEW.

ONE OF THE BUILDINGS HERE, I'M NOT GOING TO POINT OUT WHICH ONE IS FROM WHERE.

ONE IS FROM COLLIERVILLE, ONE IS FROM SOUTHLAKE, AND ONE IS FROM WHERE I LIVE.

FRISCO. SO WHAT I'M TRYING TO POINT OUT HERE IS A RETAIL STRIP BUILDING, IRRESPECTIVE OF THE TENANT, WHICH WE DON'T KNOW WHAT THE FINAL TENANTS ARE GOING TO BE IN THIS BUILDING, THERE ARE SEVERAL WAYS YOU CAN BRING INTEREST TO THE BUILDING IN CAPS CAN BE TREATED DIFFERENTLY. IF YOU LOOK AT THE TOP PICTURE, IT'S A NEW IT'S BASICALLY A DAILY PLACE, LIKE A SANDWICH EATING PLACE.

AND YOU CAN SEE HOW THEY HAVE ADDED THAT OUTDOOR SEATING, THAT BROAD CANOPY, AS WELL AS THE TOP PORTION WITH THE SKYLIGHT.

HONESTLY, NO BUILDINGS REALLY REQUIRE A SKYLIGHT.

THAT WAS ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN ELEMENT. IF YOU LOOK AT THE LOWER BUILDING ON THE PICTURE, YOU CAN SEE THE VARIATION OF THE PARAPETS AND HOW WE ALWAYS TALK ABOUT IF YOU HAVE RAISED PARAPETS TO CREATE VARIATION, ALWAYS KEPT THEM, ALWAYS HAVE.

AN END CAP KIND OF DEFINES THAT RAISED PARAPET AND GIVES A DEFINITION TO THE BUILDING.

YOU CAN LOOK AT THE BUILDING MATERIALS. THOSE ARE MOST OF THOSE ARE HIGH QUALITY BRICK OR MASONRY MATERIALS.

SOME OF THE PICTURES I HAD COME ACROSS OR EVEN HAVE VISITED THE SITES PERSONALLY THROUGHOUT THE METROPLEX, THERE ARE THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS OF EXAMPLES WHERE YOU CAN INCORPORATE THOSE DESIGN ELEMENTS AND MAKE A BUILDING LOOK TRULY UNIQUE.

IT IS VERY FRESH IN OUR MIND. WHAT WE SAW WHEN THE PROJECT WAS APPROVED AND THE RETAIL BUILDING WAS APPROVED.

THAT WAS A SIMILAR SHALE BUILDING WITH NO TENANT FINALIZED.

HOWEVER, THEIR ELEVATIONS ACTUALLY KEPT SOME OF THOSE.

IF YOU CLICK MAYBE 1 OR 2 SLIDES GO DOWN. FATHER.

FATHER, FATHER. SO THAT WAS THE RETAIL BUILDING.

GO ONE UP. THAT WAS APPROVED ON TOWNEES. THAT'S UNDER CONSTRUCTION NOW.

WOULD BE FINISHED PRETTY SOON. SO YOU CAN SEE THE VARIETY OF COLOR, THE MATERIAL, THE HEIGHT AND THE DEPTH IS DIFFERENT.

NOW, IF WE GO BACK TO THE PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATION.

GO BACK ONE MORE. YES. ANOTHER CONCERN YOU CAN SEE IS THE KIND OF THE MONOTONOUS NATURE OF THE BUILDING.

IF YOU DEFINE HOW TRIPARTITE BUILDING DESIGN IS EVALUATED, YOU HAVE A HEAVY MATERIAL BASE.

MOST OF THE DARKER COLOR OR THE STONE BASE, AND THEN YOU HAVE A MIDDLE PORTION AND A TOP.

THREE DISTINCT PHASES OF THE BUILDINGS ARE DEFINED IN OUR UDO.

[01:35:04]

IF YOU LOOK AT ALL THOSE GLAZING AND THE OPENING OF THE FENESTRATION.

THIS BUILDING IS FACING WEST THROUGH GEOGRAPHIC WEST.

IF YOU LOOK AT THE EVENING SUN, IT'S MORE THAN LIKELY THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO EITHER INSTALL BLINDS OR SOME SORT OF SUNBLOCK TO PREVENT THE EVENING SUN. SO THERE ARE SEVERAL ISSUES, AND WE CAN GO ITEM BY ITEM ON WHICH STANDARDS THEY HAVE NOT MET.

BUT THAT HAS BEEN STAFF'S MAIN CONCERN WITH THIS SITE PLAN APPLICATION.

AND WITH THAT, THAT'S ALL I HAVE FOR YOU. HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF CIRCA.

WHAT IS YOUR MAIN CONCERN THAT THE BUILDING EXTERIOR DESIGN DOES NOT MEET THE SUN? CAN YOU PUT THAT BACK UP THE DESIGN THERE? THANK YOU.

THAT'S YOUR NUMBER ONE CONCERN? YES, SIR. WHAT IF WE JUST POP THE ROOF OFF THE GABLED ROOF AND MAKE IT FLAT? DOES THAT HELP? AGAIN, I AM NOT THE DESIGNER, HOWEVER, I.

I GO BACK TO MY RECOMMENDATION. APPLICANT CAN CONTINUE TO WORK ON IMPROVING THE BUILDING ELEVATION.

INTRODUCE ELEMENTS THAT MAKE THIS BUILDING MORE INTERESTING VISUALLY AND WORTHY OF WHEN WHEN YOU DRIVE INTO SUNNYVALE, THERE'S A DIFFERENT LOOK AND FEEL. AND THAT'S WHAT WE ARE TRYING TO ENFORCE HERE ON BELL LINE.

I WAS HAVING THIS CONVERSATION WITH ONE OF THE CONTRACTORS THAT'S ACTUALLY WORKING ON THE APPLICANT'S OTHER PROJECT, THE C STORE, AND WE JUST HAVE THIS CONVERSATION ABOUT CONSTRUCTION TIMELINE AND THINGS.

AND WE WERE TALKING ABOUT HOW, OH MY GOD, HOW THAT GAS STATION IS PROBABLY THE NICEST LOOKING GAS STATION IN ALL OF OUR METROPLEX.

AND I AGREE, AND WE ARE PROUD TO SAY THAT THOSE ARE THE TYPE OF BUILDINGS AND TYPE OF DESIGN TYPE OF MATERIAL WE'RE LOOKING FOR.

BECAUSE WHEN YOU DRIVE NEXT TO BELTLINE AS YOU CROSS TOWN EAST, YOU CAN TELL LEFT OF TOWN.

IS THAT SUNNYVALE? AND AS YOU GO FARTHER, THAT'S PROBABLY NOT SUNNYVALE.

AND THAT'S WHAT WE WANT TO CONTINUE ON GATEWAY PARK AND ON BELTLINE.

SO YOU JUST WANT THEM TO DROP ANOTHER WHAT THEY ALREADY DID WITH THE BLACK RETAIL CENTER.

YOU JUST WANT THEM TO DROP ANOTHER ONE OF THOSE OVER HERE. AND THAT WILL MAKE THAT WILL SURVIVE. NOT GOING TO BE AN EXACT MATCH OF COURSE. NO, NO, I UNDERSTAND THAT. WHAT I'M TRYING TO UNDERSTAND IS WHAT SPECIFICALLY I, I'M IN THE BUSINESS OF DOING THESE ALL THE TIME.

AND THIS HAS GOT I MEAN, I'M NOT SAYING THIS IS BEAUTIFUL, BUT I'M NOT SAYING THIS MATCHES WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR, BUT THIS IS A QUALITY RETAIL CENTER. AND YOU, SINCE YOU SHOWED US TWO STUCCO RETAIL CENTERS IN YOUR PICTURES AND FRISCO AND PLANO, SO OR IN SO I'M, I'M CURIOUS AS TO WHAT IS IT YOU DON'T LIKE THE ROOF, DO YOU? NOT LIKE THE FACT THE GLASS? DO YOU NOT LIKE THE THE COLOR.

DO YOU NOT WANT. YOU DON'T WANT LIGHT COLORED BRICK AND STONE.

IT LOOKS LIKE. WHAT? WHAT? HELP US UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU WANT TO SEE SO WE CAN HELP PUT THAT INTO A PD OR PUT THAT INTO THIS AND GET THERE.

I BELIEVE MAYBE LIKE IS NOT THE RIGHT TERM. WHAT WE ARE TRYING TO TALK ABOUT IS THE BUILDING ARTICULATION AND DESIGN STANDARDS OF THE UDO SECTION.

3.060 SO IF I START TALKING ABOUT THE NONRESIDENTIAL FRONT FACADE ENTRY REQUIREMENT, A FRONT FACADE SHALL BE ARTICULATED AND DESIGNED TO PRESENT A DISTINCTIVE ENTRY PRESENCE EMPHASIZING THE BUILDING'S ENTRY POINT ALONG THE FACADE.

EACH BUILDING SHALL PROVIDE A SHELTERED ENTRY TRIPARTITE BUILDING DESIGN SLASH COMPOSITION.

THESE ARE STRAIGHT FROM OUR UDO SO BUILDING SHALL INCORPORATE A TRIPARTITE BUILDING, COMPOSITION BASE, MIDDLE AND TOP. THE TRIPARTITE SHALL BE PROPORTIONED TO THE OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE TRIPARTITE AND THE OVERALL STRUCTURE.

THERE IS A PICTURE AS AN EXAMPLE IN OUR UDO TOO, AND THESE HAVE NOT BEEN MET.

SO IT'S NOT THAT I DON'T LIKE THE ELEVATION IS THAT THESE STANDARDS HAVE NOT BEEN MET.

DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? OKAY. OKAY. SO THE BUT THE THE PHASE ONE WAS BUILT AND IT LOOKS VERY, VERY SIMILAR JUST WITH DIFFERENT COLORS. RIGHT. OR AM I, AM I, I CAN I SAY PHASE ONE, I SAY THE ONE THAT'S ON THE VERY, VERY NORTH SIDE ON TOWN. EAST. IS THAT IS THAT WHAT YOU WOULD CALL THAT PHASE ONE, OR WOULD YOU CALL IT THE ORIGINAL RETAIL ONE? WE'LL CALL THAT RETAIL ONE, THE ONE THAT'S GOT THE BLACK FACADE ON IT.

SO WHAT I'M TRYING TO DO IS HELP US GET THERE SO WE CAN, YOU KNOW, MOVE THIS DOWN THE ROAD AND GET AND GET TO AN APPROVAL VERSUS AN A DENIAL BASED ON STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION. AS LONG AS IT MEETS THE STANDARDS, THEN YES.

AND I THINK THAT'S THE THE BOTTOM LINE TO YOU THAT THIS DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS.

SO WHATEVER THE ULTIMATE PRESENTATION BACK IS, IT'S JUST GOT TO MEET THE STANDARDS.

I LOOK AT THIS AND AND THE FIRST TIME I SAW IT, I THOUGHT, YOU KNOW, THERE'S NOTHING ABOUT THE DESIGN OF THIS BUILDING THAT'S EXCITING TO ME. OKAY. THAT'S FINE. BUT THE BIG THING THAT I NOTICED WAS THE GLASS FACING THE WEST.

AND THAT IS A HUGE PROBLEM FOR ME, BECAUSE IF YOU EVER EAT AT DOS CHARLES AT 5:00 IN THE SUMMER,

[01:40:05]

THEY'VE DONE ALL SORTS OF THINGS TO TRY TO ELIMINATE THE SUN.

THERE IS NOTHING THAT WILL BLOCK THAT 5:00 SUN FROM SCORCHING PEOPLE IN HERE.

AND WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN IS THE TENANTS WILL THEN BECOME CREATIVE INDEPENDENTLY TO TRY TO LIMIT THE SUN.

AND WHAT HAPPENS IF A DENTAL OFFICE WANTS TO MOVE IN AND THEY NEED PATIENT PRIVACY NOW? WHAT ARE THEY GOING TO DO? NOW, I'M NOT SAYING IT HAS TO BE BRICK ALL THE WAY ACROSS THE FRONT BY ANY MEANS, BUT I THINK SOME CONSIDERATION HAS TO BE MADE IN THE OVERALL DESIGN THAT WE'RE DEALING WITH.

05:00 SUN COMING OUT OF THE WEST. AND THIS TO ME IS IS GOING TO BE A PROBLEM.

SO I WOULD I WOULD ARGUE THEY JUST CHOOSE BETTER GLAZING.

I MEAN, WE GOT GLASS BUILDINGS DOWNTOWN THAT YOU THE OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING IS 140 AND THE INSIDE OF THE GLASS IS 172.

THAT'S NOT WHAT'S PRESENTED. NO, I UNDERSTAND THAT.

YEAH. SO I THINK WHAT SHE WAS SAYING IS, HEY, MEET THE SUPS, MAKE A MAKE A PRESENTATION AND LOOK IF IT IF IT'S GOT THIS OVERALL DESIGN, IT MEETS THE SUPS. SO BE IT. YOU KNOW, I CERTAINLY WOULDN'T VOTE AGAINST THAT.

BUT I AM CONCERNED ABOUT THE AMOUNT OF GLASS ON THIS, PARTICULARLY SINCE AS FAR AS I UNDERSTAND, WE DON'T YET KNOW WHO'S GOING TO BE THE RENTERS.

IS THAT IS THAT CORRECT? DID I UNDERSTAND YOU SAY THAT THAT WE DON'T KNOW WHO THE TENANTS ARE GOING TO BE? NO, WE DO NOT. OKAY. WELL, THAT'S THAT'S MY ONLY COMMENT IS I'M WORRIED ABOUT THE AMOUNT OF GLASS, AND I JUST DON'T WANT IT TO LOOK LIKE A STATE FAIR WHEN YOU DRIVE DOWN.

AND ALL OF A SUDDEN YOU GOT ALL THESE POSTERS THAT PEOPLE PUT UP IN ADVERTISEMENTS JUST TO BLOCK SUN.

THAT'S MY THAT'S MY CONCERN. THE QUESTION, THOUGH, IS THE GLASS AN ISSUE WITH THE UDO? THE GLASS WOULD NOT BE. BUT I DIDN'T THINK SO.

NO. OKAY, SO WE'RE ADDRESSING SOMETHING THAT YOU DON'T EVEN HAVE A CONCERN WITH, RIGHT? I DO HAVE A CONCERN, BUT IF YOU ASK ME IF THAT'S A REQUIREMENT OF THE UDO, THEN NO.

YEAH. OKAY. MORE ARTICULATION. YOU WANT MORE ARTICULATION AND YOU WANT MORE WITH THE THE WITH THE BUILDING ITSELF BETWEEN, LET'S JUST SAY THE END CAPS, THE CENTER AND THE THE.

IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR? TO. YOU KNOW, I'M TRYING TO GET OUT OF YOU WHAT YOU WANT US TO DO TO MAKE THIS WORK.

SO IF YOU LOOK AT IN YOUR STAFF REPORT, I HAD COPIED ALL THE STANDARDS OF THE ARCHITECTURE REQUIREMENT FOR NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS.

IT'S ON PAGE 69 OF THE STAFF REPORT. SO THERE ARE SEVERAL ELEMENTS OF ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS THAT ARE LISTED FOR BELL LINE CORRIDOR.

AND THOSE HAVE BEEN SHARED WITH THE APPLICANT.

SO IT'S DIFFICULT FOR ME TO SAY WHAT HAS TO BE PRESENTED, BECAUSE OUR JOB IS TO REVIEW A BUILDING ELEVATION AND MAKE SURE IT MEETS THE DESIGN STANDARDS. IT'S NOT WE CANNOT DICTATE HOW THE BUILDING DESIGN IS GOING TO BE.

OUR JOB IS TO MAKE SURE THAT OUR STANDARDS ARE UPHELD WITH THE NEW DEAL.

CAN I ASK A QUESTION? THIS IS JUST TO EDUCATE ME ON THIS.

HOW DID THIS GET PRESENTED TONIGHT? IF IT HASN'T PASSED YOUR LITMUS TEST OF WHAT'S ACCEPTABLE? EVERY EVERY APPLICANT HAS A RIGHT TO PRESENT AN APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND TO TOWN COUNCIL EVENTUALLY.

STAFF ALWAYS REVIEWS PLANS AND AN APPLICATION JUST LIKE WE SAW WITH THE ZONING APPLICATION.

SO EVERY ZONING APPLICATION, EVERY SITE PLAN APPLICATION THAT THE PROCESS DICTATES, THAT HAVE TO GO THROUGH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND TOWN COUNCIL STAFF CANNOT CONSTANTLY PUSH BACK AND SAY, WE TRY THAT, OKAY, THIS DOES NOT MEET XYZ.

AND IF THE RESPONSE IS IN IN APPLICANT'S OPINION, IT MEETS ALL THE STANDARDS OF UDO, THEN STAFF'S NEXT STEP IS TO PRESENT THAT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION OR STAFF REVIEW.

THAT'S THE PROCESS. SO WE CANNOT STOP AN APPLICATION FROM MOVING FORWARD.

IS THE APPLICANT HERE? YES, SIR. OKAY. SO I WANT TO SAY ONE THING.

SO I JUST READ WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR. YOU'RE LOOKING FOR MORE ARTICULATION, WHICH IS WHAT I SAID.

MORE ARTICULATION. AND YOU WANT THE TRIPARTITE.

YOU WANT A TOP, A MIDDLE AND A BOTTOM. SO I WONDER IF THEY JUST RECOLOR THIS.

DOES THAT ADDRESS THAT? TRIPARTITE DESIGN IS NOT JUST ABOUT THE COLOR.

SO A TRIPARTITE ITS MATERIALS RIGHT. ITS MATERIALS.

YOU DIFFERENTIATE MATERIAL MATERIAL. AT THE BOTTOM YOU HAVE THE SECOND LEVEL MATERIAL AT THE MIDDLE AND THEN THE TOP.

YOU HAVE A HEAVY BASE, YOU HAVE A MID, THEN YOU HAVE THE TOP I GET IT I UNDERSTAND I'M JUST TRYING TO HELP.

ALL RIGHT. LET'S HAVE THE APPLICANT COME UP AND TALK.

[01:45:05]

MY NAME IS DREW DANOWSKY. I'M WITH CLAYMORE ENGINEERING, 3231 HARWOOD ROAD, BEDFORD, TEXAS.

I'M THE CIVIL ENGINEER AND APPLICANT ON THE PROJECT.

DOESN'T SOUND LIKE WE HAVE ANYTHING EXCITING TO TALK ABOUT WITH YOU.

NO DRAINAGE AND, YOU KNOW, WATER METERS. SO I'M GOING TO ASK MY ARCHITECT DANIEL EBARB, TO COME UP, AND WE CAN WE CAN START TALKING ABOUT SOME OF THE BUILDING STUFF.

BUT IF YOU GUYS DO HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE SITE PLAN, THE LAYOUT, THE LANDSCAPING.

I'M YOUR PERSON. OKAY? OKAY. DEREK SALZER AGAIN 345.

NEW APPROACH. WE'LL TAG TEAM. OKAY. SO I DISAGREE WITH THAT'S SOMETHING YOU HEAR EVERY DAY, RIGHT? WE USUALLY HAVE. GOOD. WE WE ARGUE A LOT.

AND LAURA AS WELL. AND WE COME TO SOMETHING. YOU KNOW, I'M TELLING THE TRUTH HERE.

WE COME TO A WE COME TO A CONSENSUS GENERALLY RETAIL BUILDING ONE WHICH YOU'VE ALREADY SEEN IN A LOT OF WAYS IS IS MORE SIMPLE THAN THIS BUILDING. AND IT HAS GLASS THAT GOES ALL THE WAY TO THE GROUND BECAUSE STOREFRONT, RETAIL, RESTAURANT, YOU CAN'T HAVE A BASE UNDER IT.

YOU CAN, BUT IT'S NOT WISE TO DO IT HAS RETAIL.

ONE HAS MULTIPLE DOORS JUST LIKE THIS. IT HAS FLAT ROOFS EVERYWHERE.

A LITTLE SLOPE ON THE END CAPS. BUT THIS IS A VERY EXPENSIVE, COMPLICATED BUILDING.

PROBABLY EVEN MORE SO THAN IT'S TALLER. IT'S IT'S A LITTLE BIGGER.

WHAT SMALLER? SQUARE FOOTAGE WISE, BUT IT'S TALLER THAN THE RETAIL ONE THAT YOU SEE UNDER.

THAT'S WRAPPING UP BY TOM THUMB. GLASS. THIS HAS MORE GLASS THAN OUR RETAIL ONE BUILDING.

I'M NOT WORRIED ABOUT THE GLASS WITH THE WITH THE SOLAR THE LOW-E GLASS THAT YOU CAN DO NOW, I DON'T THINK THAT'S GOING TO BE AN ISSUE. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THEY USED OVER AT THE BUILDING YOU MENTIONED, JERRY.

BUT THAT CAN BE HANDLED. I BELIEVE THE TRIPARTITE DESIGN IS MET ON THIS.

I KNOW THAT'S A DISAGREEMENT. WE HAVE AND IT'S NOT JUST COLOR.

THIS IS A TWO DIMENSIONAL DRAWING. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU GUYS HAVE THE 3D RENDERING.

DOES ANYBODY? I DIDN'T BRING IT. THE THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL HAS A FLOOR PLAN CUT OUT OF THE FRONT THAT SHOWS THE ARTICULATION.

YEAH. YOU HAVE THE SETBACKS. IT HAS MORE SETBACKS THAN RETAIL ONE AS FAR AS THE UNDULATION OR FACADE, WHATEVER YOU WANT TO CALL IT. SO IT'S IT'S HARD TO SEE IN TWO DIMENSIONS.

HERE YOU HAVE THE INS AND OUTS THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT.

AND THEN THERE IS A BASE. I MEAN, BECAUSE YOU HAVE SO MUCH GLASS YOU CAN'T REALLY SEE THE BASE VERY WELL, BUT YOU CAN SEE LINES ON THE, ON THE MATERIALS WHERE THE BREAK IS.

NOW, MAYBE IF IT'S A DIFFERENT COLOR, DIFFERENT BRICK, DIFFERENT STONE, THAT MAY BE WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT.

BUT MY REQUEST IS TO APPROVE THIS GOING FORWARD TO COUNCIL UNDER THE CONDITION THAT OVER THESE NEXT TWO WEEKS OR THREE WEEKS, WHENEVER THE COUNCIL MEETING IS THAT WE WILL MEET AND HAVE MORE DISCUSSION ON THE TRIPARTITE DESIGN. THAT'S MY THAT'S MY RECOMMENDATION.

SO I'LL LET YOU TALK. YEAH, YEAH. DANIEL IBAR WITH IBAR.

GUEST ARCHITECTURE 3309 ELM IN DALLAS. I DON'T HAVE A LOT TO ADD TO THAT, REALLY, EXCEPT THAT, YOU KNOW, THE GLAZING. ONCE AGAIN, IT WILL BE VERY HIGH PERFORMANCE GLAZING IT WHEN YOU LOOK AT ALL THE NUMBERS AND THE THE HEAT TRANSMISSION NUMBERS AND ALL THAT, IT ACTUALLY PERFORMS BETTER THAN THE WALL, BUT IT LETS THE LIGHT IN, YOU KNOW. SO I THINK THAT'S PROBABLY OKAY.

WE, WE MIGHT CAN I DON'T KNOW IF THE DEVELOPER MIGHT BE WILLING TO BRING SOME OF THAT HIGHEST GLASS DOWN TO REDUCE SOME OF THAT.

AND I AGREE THAT THE TRIPARTITE DESIGN IS HERE.

WE HAVE STONE ON THE BOTTOM AND THEN BRICK AND THEN STUCCO UP ABOVE.

THE VERTICAL ARTICULATION IS A LITTLE HARDER BECAUSE WE HAVE THE PITCHED ROOFS INSTEAD OF FLAT ROOFS AND PARAPETS ON THE FRONT.

SO THAT'S ALL I'VE REALLY GOT TO SAY. YEAH. WE'RE WILLING TO CONTINUE WORKING, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE WE WANT WE WANT IT TO GO FORWARD FOR OUR DEVELOPER.

WELL, WE LOOKED AT, YOU KNOW. YOU KNOW WHAT THE TOM THUMB LOOKS LIKE? RETAIL ONE, THE CONVENIENCE STORE. I TOLD THESE GUYS, AND ONE OF THE OWNERS IS SITTING BACK HERE THAT WE DON'T WANT IT TO LOOK LIKE TOM THUMB. WE DON'T WANT EVERYTHING TO LOOK THE SAME.

JUST LIKE WHEN WE BUILT NEXT DOOR. WE WANTED TO BE COMPLEMENTARY TO THE BANK AND TO TOWN HALL.

BUT, YOU KNOW, KIND OF BLEND IN. SO THE PALETTE OF MATERIALS IS SIMILAR, BUT THE WAY IT'S EXPRESSED IS DIFFERENT.

SO IT'S GOING TO BE A VARIETY. IT'S LIKE THE MONOTONOUS THING YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT WITH THE HOUSES.

[01:50:02]

AND THAT'S WHAT THAT'S WHY I SUPPORT THIS. I MEAN, THIS IS NOT MY BUILDING.

I MEAN, WE'RE JUST SELLING THEM THE LAND AND WORKING WITH THEM AND STAFF.

I DIDN'T REALIZE THE COMING TONIGHT THAT WE HAD THE WE DIDN'T HAVE THE FULL APPROVAL.

MAYBE I DIDN'T READ THE FINE PRINT, BUT I BELIEVE THIS DESIGN DOES MEET THE REQUIREMENTS.

JUST MY OPINION. ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION FOR THE APPLICANTS? JUST A COMMENT THAT I FEEL LIKE MAYBE IT'S IT'S JUST MISSING SOME CHARM.

AND I THINK WITH SUNNYVALE AND THE WHOLE RURAL FEEL AND WE HAVE THAT NEXT DOOR, I THINK IT'S JUST KIND OF LOOKS A LITTLE TOO INDUSTRIAL OR TOO MODERN.

MAYBE THAT'S WHAT ISN'T SITTING RIGHT. HILL COUNTRY MODERN IS THE GATEWAY VILLAGE IS THE GATEWAY PARK.

THAT IS THE THEME. YEAH. AND THE BUILDING, WE JUST RETAIL ONE IS A LITTLE MODERN.

I THINK THAT'S WHAT SHE LIKES ABOUT RETAIL ONE.

BUT MAYBE SHE WON'T. MAYBE SHE DOESN'T. BUT I THINK THAT'S WHAT SHE LIKES ABOUT RETAIL ONE.

IT'S A LITTLE CONTEMPORARY. YEAH. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? COMMENT IS PERSONALLY, I SEE THE SIMILARITIES TO RETAIL ONE.

I PERSONALLY I LIKE IT. THAT'S MY COMMENT. ANYBODY ELSE? YOU KNOW, I'VE SAID MY COMMENT. MY ONLY CONCERN IS THE GLASS.

AND REALLY, WHEN I LOOK AT IT, IT'S THE GLASS THAT'S ABOVE THE THE COVERS, THE AWNINGS.

BECAUSE JUST OF MY EXPERIENCE EATING IN RESTAURANTS THAT FACE WEST, JUST YOU SIT THERE AND YOU TRY TO HAVE A CONVERSATION.

YOU GOT SUN BLASTING IN THE EYE. THAT'S REALLY MY ONLY NEGATIVE COMMENT ABOUT THIS.

BUT LOOK, I'M NOT AN ARCHITECT. I DON'T PLAY ONE ON TV.

I THIS DOESN'T BOTHER ME IN THE OVERALL DESIGN.

I JUST AM CONCERNED ABOUT THE GLASS. THAT'S IT.

ALRIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANTS? ALL RIGHT. ANY DISCUSSION HERE BEFORE WE TAKE A VOTE? ALL RIGHT. DOES ANYONE HAVE A MOTION THEY'D LIKE TO MAKE? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. CASE 1860 SP VICTORY SUNNYVALE RETAIL SITE PLAN AS PRESENTED.

I'LL SECOND. ALL RIGHT. THE MOTION HAS BEEN MADE BY BRONSON AND IT'S BEEN SECONDED BY KEVIN POINTS.

DO I HAVE ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL RIGHT. THOSE IN FAVOR OF ACCEPTING AS PROPOSED.

RAISE YOUR HAND, PLEASE. ALL RIGHT. IT'S UNANIMOUS.

SO IT PASSES AS PRESENTED. ALL RIGHT. IS THERE ANY OTHER BUSINESS THAT ANYONE ON THE COMMISSION WOULD LIKE TO BRING UP? ANYTHING. ALL RIGHT. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN? I'LL MOTION TO ADJOURN. CHARLIE, YOU WERE FAST ON THAT ONE FOR THAT.

BOY, THAT WAS MULTIPLE. I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHO GOT TO THE BUTTON.

I'LL SECOND. ALL RIGHT. BUT IT'S BEEN MADE AND SECONDED.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF GOING HOME, RAISE YOUR HAND IF YOU WANT TO STAY ALL NIGHT OR KEEP YOUR HAND UP.

OKAY. WE'RE ADJOURNED. THANKS, EVERYBODY.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.