[*A portion of this video is without audio*]
[I. Public Hearing Items ]
[00:14:09]
[00:14:18]
CONSTRUCTION. AND ALSO IT MEETS THE MINIMUM DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS FROM THE MAIN STRUCTURE WHERE THE FIRE CANNOT ESCAPE IF THERE WAS A FIRE.[00:14:28]
ALSO IN SUNNYVALE, WE REQUIRE ALL OUR STRUCTURES TO BE SPRINKLERED, SO I'M ASSUMING THE HOUSE WOULD BE SPRINKLERED, NOT THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE, BUT THE MAIN HOUSE AT ABOUT 4000 SQUARE FOOT.5000 SQUARE FOOT. WHERE ALL THE STRUCTURES. SO THIS ONE IS ANYWAY NOT.
HOW ABOUT THE MAIN HOUSE? I DO NOT KNOW. WAS THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE MAIN HOUSE.
IF IT'S MORE THAN 5000 IT WOULD BE SPRINKLER.
IT IS. I DO NOT KNOW. WE CAN ASK THE APPLICANT.
APPLICANT, WOULD YOU MIND? OR THE CONTRACTOR COMING FORWARD?
[00:15:06]
WOULD YOU STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE? JEAN CHRISTIAN SALA, 7331 COMPASS, GRAND PRAIRIE, TEXAS, 75054 OKAY MAIN STREET LLC.WHAT IS THE. DO YOU KNOW WHAT'S THE SIZE OF THE MAIN HOUSES? THE MAIN DWELLING THE SIZE OF THE MAIN HOUSE, RIGHT, IS IS APPROXIMATELY.
40 500FT². IS THERE A SPRINKLER IN THE HOUSE? YES. FIRE SPRINKLER INSIDE THE HOUSE. THE SPRINKLER? YES. NOT THE PROPERTY, BUT INSIDE THE HOUSE. NOT LANDSCAPING, BUT I'M TALKING ABOUT INSIDE THE HOUSE. THERE'S A FIRE SPRINKLER. NO.
OKAY. OKAY. MR. ALLEN, ANY QUESTIONS? YOU HAD ONE OTHER QUESTION.
SINCE THIS OBVIOUSLY IS A LIVING QUARTERS OF SOME SORT IS IT WILL IT BE SERVICED BY SEPTIC? YEAH. THE ADU, THE ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT. WOULD THERE BE CONNECTED TO THE SEWER SYSTEM OR WOULD THAT BE SEPTIC, A SEPTIC? THAT'S ALL I HAVE, MAYOR. THE ADDITIONAL QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT. SO JUST TO CONFIRM, ARE YOU PLANNING TO CONCRETE A DRIVEWAY FROM EXTENDED DRIVEWAY TO THE ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT OR NOT? BASED ON THE BUDGET. NO. OKAY. THE ANSWER IS NO.
OKAY. AND FIRE CHIEF AND STAFF THINKS THAT'S OKAY.
YES, SIR. MR. HAD ANY QUESTIONS? ANYBODY HAS ANY QUESTIONS? OKAY. THANK YOU SIR. APPRECIATE YOU. OKAY. ARE THERE ADDITIONAL DISCUSSIONS OR QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR WITHIN YOURSELF? OKAY. THIS IS THE FIRST READING. IF NOT, COUNCIL CAN HAVE A MOTION WITH RESPECT TO ITEM NUMBER I1.
MAYOR A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM NUMBER A1 AS PRESENTED.
SECOND MOTION MADE BY MAYOR PRO, SECONDED BY MR. CLARK TO APPROVE ITEM NUMBER I1 AS PRESENTED.
EVERYONE HEARD THE MOTION. ARE THERE ADDITIONAL DISCUSSIONS? IF NOT, ALL IN FAVOR SIGNIFY ALL OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES SEVEN ZERO.
CONGRATULATIONS, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. JUST A QUICK ANNOUNCEMENT.
THIS LAST ITEM. APPARENTLY, OUR SWAGIT AUDIO SYSTEM WAS NOT FUNCTIONAL.
THE VIDEO WAS WORKING. I BELIEVE THAT PEOPLE COULD SEE, BUT COULD NOT HEAR.
SO WE DO RECORD THE AUDIO OF THE MEETING, SO HOPEFULLY WE'LL BE ABLE TO HAVE THAT RECTIFIED SO THAT WHEN THE VIDEO IS POSTED ONLINE THAT THE VIDEO AND THE AUDIO WILL MATCH. SO IT IS NOW WORKING GOING FORWARD.
BUT ON THIS LAST ITEM, THE AUDIO WAS NOT WORKING.
CORRECT. I GOT YOUR MOTION. THE MOTION WAS RECORDED BY AUDIO.
I GOT IT DOWN. IT CAME ON ABOUT ONE MINUTE BEFORE Y'ALL QUIT TALKING. THANKS.
THANKS. THANKS, MR. JONES. OKAY, MOVING ON TO THE DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS PORTION OF THE AGENDA.
[J. Discussion and Action Items ]
ITEM NUMBER J1 DISCUSS, CONSIDER, AND ACT UPON THE FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE 2024 DASH 15 OF THE TOWN OF SUNNYVALE, TEXAS, EFFECTIVELY UPDATING THE COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT AND ENGINEERING FEE SECTIONS OF THE MASTER FEE SCHEDULE, PROVIDING FOR AN INCREASE IN FEES COLLECTED TO THE APPROPRIATELY TO APPROPRIATELY REFLECT AND RECOVER SERVICES PROVIDED.GOOD EVENING SIR. HOW ARE YOU? MAYOR AND COUNCIL? YEAH. BEFORE OUR FAIRLY NEW CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL MAKES HIS FIRST PRESENTATION HERE, I DO WANT TO JUST GIVE A TINY BIT OF BACKGROUND.
IN 2019, WILLDAN, A CONSULTING FIRM, CAME IN AND DID A USER FEE STUDY FOR THE TOWN.
AND BASED ON THAT USER FEE, WE IMPLEMENTED A WIDE VARIETY OF FEES AND FEE SCHEDULES.
WE ASKED WILLDAN TO COME BACK THIS PAST YEAR AND DO AN UPDATE TO THAT STUDY.
THIS ONE IS PARTICULARLY IMPORTANT BECAUSE IT DOES AFFECT OUR COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT AND I BELIEVE, PLAN REVIEW FEES. SO SO WE'RE WE'RE HAPPY TO HAVE CJ PRESENT WHAT THE PROPOSED CHANGES AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO YOU ARE TONIGHT.
THANK YOU, MR. JONES. APPRECIATE THAT. GREAT.
GREAT INTRO. MR. MAYOR COUNCIL, THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME TONIGHT, CJ, YOUR NEW BUILDING OFFICIAL.
[00:20:05]
YEAH. SO I JUST WANTED TO GO OVER THIS REAL QUICK.WE DO HAVE SOME BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR YOU.
AS MR. JONES MENTIONED, THE FEE SCHEDULE WAS UPDATED BACK IN 2019.
THAT REFLECTED THAT FEE STUDY THAT WAS DONE BY WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES.
HOWEVER, THE BUILDING, THE COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT FEES WERE BASED ON SQUARE FOOTAGE.
SO WHAT I WILL SHOW YOU AND JUST A QUICK MOMENT HERE IS THAT, LIKE I SAID, SUNNY, SUNNYVALE HAS BEEN FOR THE PAST FIVE YEARS NOW, SIX YEARS NOW, SUBSIDIZING THE COST OF CONSTRUCTION PERMITS PERMIT RELATED ACTIVITIES AT A MUCH HIGHER RATE THAN NECESSARY SPECIFICALLY FOR COMMERCIAL PROJECTS. SO THIS ORDINANCE IS PROPOSING A NEW COMMERCIAL PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE FOR ADOPTION BY BY COUNCIL.
SO THIS IS A GOOD COMPARISON HERE. ACCORDING TO NATIONAL AVERAGES, BUILDING VALUATION DATA, IF YOU WANTED TO BUILD A 100,000 SQUARE FOOT WAREHOUSE OF TYPE TWO B CONSTRUCTION, YOU'D BE LOOKING AT ABOUT $126 A SQUARE FOOT BILL TO DO THAT, WHICH WOULD PUT THAT PROJECT AT ABOUT $12.6 MILLION TO DO.
42.7 MILLION. SO THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THOSE PROJECTS ARE DIRECT RELATION TO THE COMPLEXITY AND THE RESOURCES REQUIRED, THE OVERALL DIFFICULTY, THE THE SPECIAL SPECIALISTS, YOU KNOW, SPECIAL CONTRACTORS AND ARCHITECTS AND DESIGN TEAM THAT YOU NEED.
AND THEY'RE NECESSARY TO COMPLETE EACH PROJECT.
SO IF YOU BREAK IT DOWN, IT'S THE SAME WAY FOR THE RESOURCES THAT THE TOWN PROVIDES.
SO FOR A WAREHOUSE PROJECT, WE'RE GOING TO PROVIDE PROBABLY BETWEEN 4 AND 8 HOURS OF PROCESSING AND REVIEW TIME, BECAUSE IT'S A PRETTY, PRETTY BASIC PROJECT TO BE ABLE TO PROCESS AND REVIEW AND TAKE CARE OF.
RIGHT NOW, IF WE WERE TO BUILD THAT WAREHOUSE IS JUST OVER.
WELL, JUST UNDER $7,000. SO IF YOU WERE TO DO THE HOSPITAL, IT'S GOING TO TAKE DOUBLE, MAYBE TRIPLE THE TIME TO PROCESS AND REVIEW JUST BECAUSE THE COMPLEXITY OF A HOSPITAL. PLUS IT'S GOING TO TAKE 40 TO 50 INSPECTIONS TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT.
LET ME ASK YOU. YES, SIR. NOT DISAGREEING WITH ANYTHING YOU SAID.
JUST A. TOWN DOESN'T NECESSARILY HAVE ALL THE EXPERTISE, RIGHT, IN BUILDING A BUILDING A HOSPITAL VERSUS RIGHT. SO WE WE RELY A LOT ON THE CERTIFICATES OR PROOF OF COMPLIANCE APPLIANCE FROM THE BUILDER. RIGHT FROM THE THE PROPERTY.
RIGHT. SO NOT NECESSARILY SO INSPECTION WISE.
IF IF THEY DO, WE WOULD ALWAYS GIVE THE CONTRACTOR OR THE DESIGN TEAM OR THE OWNER OWNERSHIP, THE GROUP OF THE HOSPITAL THE RIGHT TO, TO SEEK A THIRD PARTY INSPECTION.
WE DO HAVE A PRETTY SUBSTANTIAL BACKGROUND IN BUILDING THESE KIND OF PROJECTS, AND WE ARE ABLE TO DO IT, BUT FOR, FOR THE, FOR THE SCHEDULE OF, OF A BUILDING LIKE THAT, WE'D PROBABLY HAVE TO BRING IN OUTSIDE HELP TO GET THAT DONE.
SO THERE WOULD BE SOME, SOME ASSOCIATED COST WITH THAT AS WELL.
SO AGAIN, I'M NOT DISAGREEING WITH ANYTHING YOU SAID. I DON'T KNOW IN THE PAST WHETHER WE USED.
WE USED OUR BUILDING INSPECTOR FOR EVERYTHING, RIGHT? WHETHER THEY HAVE THE RIGHT SKILL OR NOT. AND WHEN WE DON'T HAVE THE SKILL, WE RELIED ON THE APPLICANTS OR THE PROPERTY OWNERS.
CERTIFICATES, ENGINEERING, CIVIL ENGINEERING, WHATEVER IT IS.
RIGHT. ANYWAY, JUST A JUST A OBSERVATION, THAT'S ALL.
THEY DEFINITELY REQUIRE MORE RESOURCES TO COMPLETE A HOSPITAL VERSUS A WAREHOUSE.
WE'RE NOT DOING HUGE PROJECTS LIKE THAT RIGHT NOW.
[00:25:03]
SO THIS IS BASED ON A TENANT FINISH OF, LET'S SAY, A 5000 SQUARE FOOT SPACE WITH, LET'S SAY IT'S A VALUE OF $150,000 THAT THEY WANT TO SPEND TO FINISH OUT THIS SPACE. SO WITH OUR CURRENT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE, THAT PERMIT AND THE REVIEW FOR THAT SPACE WOULD BE $790. WELL, IF YOU LOOK AT WHAT WE WOULD SPEND TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT AND THE TOWN RESOURCES REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT, WE'RE LOSING. I MEAN, WE'RE NOT EVEN PAYING FOR HALF OF OF WHAT WE PUT INTO IT AS THE TOWN.SO IF WE USE THE PROPOSED. I'M NOT I'M NOT SAYING THAT OUR THAT OUR FEE SCHEDULE NEEDS TO WE'RE NOT IN THE, WE'RE NOT, WE'RE NOT IN THE BUSINESS OF MAKING MONEY. YOU KNOW WE'RE WE'RE NOT A, YOU KNOW, WE'RE NOT A FOR PROFIT OR WHATEVER.
WE'RE JUST TRYING TO COVER THE COSTS OF OF WHAT WE'RE DOING, TRULY.
SO IF WE WERE TO UP THE FEES TO THE PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULE, THEN THAT'S WHAT YOUR PERMIT COST WOULD BE AT 1200 FOR THAT 5000 SQUARE FOOT FINISH OUT WITH A VALUATION OF $150,000.
SO IT'S A GOOD WAY TO WAY TO SHOW HOW THAT HOW THAT EXAMPLE WORKS.
IF WE, IF WE LOOK AT NEIGHBORING COMMUNITIES IT'S KIND OF THE LAST POINT I WANTED TO MAKE.
IF WE LOOK AT NEIGHBORING COMMUNITIES CLOSE BY, FORNEY, ROCKWELL, ROWLETT, GARLAND ALL THESE DIFFERENT COMMUNITIES, I THERE IS AN ATTACHMENT IN YOUR IT'S NOT PART OF THIS, THIS POWERPOINT, BUT THERE WAS AN ATTACHMENT AS PART OF THE COUNCIL PACKET THAT SHOWED WHAT THOSE COMMUNITIES ARE CURRENTLY CHARGING FOR COMMERCIAL PERMIT FEES.
SO THE LAST SLIDE THAT I HAVE KIND OF GIVES YOU A BASIS OF WHAT I'M PROPOSING AS OUR COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE, AND IT IS BASED OFF OF KIND OF WHAT OUR NEIGHBORS ARE DOING.
AND IT I MEAN, CURRENTLY, YOU CAN SEE THAT WE'RE WELL BELOW AVERAGE FOR, FOR CHARGING FOR WHAT WE'RE CHARGING TO ACTUALLY PERFORM, YOU KNOW, THIS THIS WORK THAT WE DO. SO IF WE WERE TO ADOPT A FEE SCHEDULE SUCH AS THIS OR SOMETHING AS SIMPLE AS WHAT GARLAND IS DOING IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE, YOU KNOW, THIS TYPE OF SCHEDULE.
BUT IF IT IF WE DO PICK THIS MODEL WHICH IS THE MODEL THAT MOST JURISDICTIONS, MOST MUNICIPALITIES USE IT WOULD BRING US INTO IN LINE WITH WITH WHAT OUR, WHAT OUR NEIGHBORING COMMUNITIES ARE DOING.
AND THAT'S ALL I HAVE. SO THE MAJOR TRANSITION IS INSTEAD OF CHARGING PER SQUARE FOOT, YOUR RECOMMENDATION IS TO CHARGE BASED ON COMPLEXITY, MEANING VALUATION IS BASED ON THE VALUE OF THE PROJECT.
CORRECT. AND THE TABLE ON THE RIGHT SIDE, YOU'VE SHOWN US RECOMMENDED ONE IS THAT COMPARABLE TO BEST PRACTICES IN CITIES? IT IS. YES. IF YOU LOOK AT THE ATTACHMENT, I AGAIN, I DON'T HAVE THAT AS PART OF THE POWERPOINT.
BUT IF YOU LOOK AT THE ATTACHMENT THAT IS INCLUDED WITH THE PACKET, I'VE GIVEN YOU AN EXAMPLE FROM WHAT FIVE DIFFERENT MUNICIPALITIES ARE CHARGING ROLETTE OR SIX ROLETTE, HEATH, ROCKWELL, GARLAND AND FORNEY.
MOST OF THEM. WELL, FOUR OF THE SIX ARE USING THIS EXACT FORMULA.
NOT THE SAME NUMBERS, BUT THEY'RE USING THE SAME FORMULA.
OKAY. COUNCIL, DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR. MAYOR? YES, SIR. I APOLOGIZE WHEN I WAS TRYING TO COMPARE THIS FROM THE DATA THAT WE HAD, THERE WAS SOME OTHER TOWNS ON THERE.
WE HAD MESQUITE OR ROCKWALL AND FORNI AND ROWLETT, AND I WAS TRYING TO COMPARE THESE NUMBERS TO THOSE TOWNS, AND IT LOOKED TO ME LIKE OUR TOWNS PRICES WERE LESS THAN EVERYBODY.
AND AGAIN, IT WAS HARD FOR ME TO YOU HAD TO PULL THEM UP ON THREE SCREENS TO LOOK AT IT. RIGHT, RIGHT. IT LOOKED TO ME LIKE THESE NUMBERS BRING US UP TO ABOUT WHERE ROWLETT IS, BUT WE'RE STILL IT LOOKED LIKE WE'RE SUBSTANTIALLY LOWER IN SOME AREAS THAN THAN ROCKWALL OR HEATH. WE STILL ARE. YES. I JUST THE ONLY REASON FOR THE ONLY MY THOUGHT PROCESS BEHIND THAT WAS I DIDN'T WANT TO, YOU KNOW, ALL OF A SUDDEN BE LIKE, HEY, IF YOU WANT TO COME BUILD IN SUNNYVALE, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO PAY MORE THAN EVERYBODY ELSE. SO IT WASN'T IT WASN'T ONE OF THOSE THINGS. I WAS JUST TRYING TO BRING IT UP TO SCALE.
SO YES, IT IS RIGHT IN LINE WITH WHAT ROCKWALL IS CHARGING.
BUT YES, FORNEY IS THE MOST EXPENSIVE ON THAT LIST.
[00:30:01]
THEY'RE CHARGING MORE THAN ANYONE TO BUILD IN FORNEY COMMERCIAL ANYWAY.I WAS JUST CHARGING A PERCENTAGE OF THAT. YEAH, AND I'M NOT OPPOSING THE FEES AT ALL.
RIGHT, RIGHT. I'M JUST WONDERING, ARE WE STILL TOO LOW? BECAUSE I WROTE NOTES ON THE SIDE, BUT I COULDN'T KEEP UP. EVEN FOLLOWING ONLINE.
SO I WROTE DOWN ROCKWALL. WAS IT 5620? WHERE WE'RE AT 4052.
AND THE REASON WHY THAT IS, IS BECAUSE ROCKWALL DOES NOT CHARGE A PERMIT.
IT DOES NOT CHARGE AN ADDITIONAL PLAN REVIEW FEE.
SO THAT PLAN REVIEW FEE IS ENCOMPASSED WITHIN THEIR WITHIN THEIR FEE.
SO MY ONLY QUESTION WOULD BE ARE WE CHARGING ENOUGH TO CAPTURE THE COST TO THE TOWN? I BELIEVE WE ARE. I DON'T WANT TO AGAIN, BEING A NOT YOU KNOW, WE'RE NOT FOR PROFIT.
RIGHT. THAT'S MY POINT. I'D RATHER CHARGE ENOUGH SO THAT WE DON'T HAVE TO SUBSIDIZE.
BY THE WAY, CJ, WELCOME TO THE RIGHT. YES, WELCOME TO THE TOWN.
THANK YOU. OKAY. THAT'S THAT'S MY ONLY COMMENT IS THAT WE'RE CHARGING ENOUGH.
SO. AND I WAS TRYING TO AGAIN, I WAS TRYING TO COMPARE THIS, AND IT WAS A LITTLE BIT OFF LOOKING AT ALL THE DIFFERENT SHEETS TO TRY TO MATCH THAT UP FOR ME. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. YEAH. I COULDN'T MATCH WITH ANYTHING.
I JUST HAVE A HARD TIME. BUT I'M SURE CJ DID THE WORK FOR THAT COUNT.
DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR CJ? MR. CLARK, JUST A COMMENT.
WELCOME TO THE TOWN. AND THANK YOU FOR PUTTING THIS TOGETHER.
YEAH YOU BET. THANK YOU. CJ IF YOU TAKE A SEAT LET ME LET ME TAKE PUBLIC COMMENTS PLEASE.
OKAY. THIS THIS TIME LET ME OPEN UP FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS.
IF THERE IS ANYONE FROM THE MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE WOULD LIKE TO COME FORWARD AND SPEAK TO THE COUNCIL ON ITEM J ONE, WOULD YOU PLEASE COME FORWARD? LET ME FINISH THIS ONE. NOBODY'S COMING FORWARD, SO I'M GOING TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC COMMENTS.
YES, MR. C.J.. I WAS JUST I WAS JUST GOING TO MENTION INCLUDED IN THIS WAS ALSO A CHANGE TO THE ENGINEERING FEES, AND I JUST DIDN'T KNOW THAT WAS KIND OF BURIED AT THE VERY BOTTOM.
IT'S NOT PART OF MY POWERPOINT. I APOLOGIZE, BUT THERE WAS ALSO AN UPDATE TO THE ENGINEERING FEES ON THE LAST FEW PAGES OF THAT ORDINANCE. SO I JUST DIDN'T KNOW IF YOU WANTED TO.
I DIDN'T KNOW IF YOU I APOLOGIZE. YEAH, I DID SEE, BUT I FORGOT TO ASK YOU THAT QUESTION.
THANK YOU. MATT. COME ON. FORWARD SIR. THANK YOU SIR.
THE ENGINEERING FEES ARE ON PAGE 47 AND 48 OF YOUR COUNCIL PACKET.
THIS IS AN UPDATE. THIS IS PRIMARILY BEING DRIVEN BY STATE LAW.
OUR INSPECTOR COMPROMISES TWO PARTS. ONE IS ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW AND NUMBER TWO, ENGINEERING INSPECTION FOR INFRASTRUCTURE, WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, PAVEMENT, THINGS OF THAT NATURE AND STATE LAW.
THE STATE PASSED A LAW ABOUT 18 MONTHS AGO THAT REQUIRED US TO CEASE AND DESIST CHARGING AND INSPECTION FEE BASED ON VALUATION, JUST THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT WE SAW WITH THE BUILDING.
THE STATE IS ACTUALLY PROHIBITED US FROM ASKING FOR THE VALUATION OF INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS AND TO CHARGE INSPECTION FEES BASED ON INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS. SO WE ADOPTED A DIFFERENT METHOD.
I CALLED AROUND TO OTHER CITIES WHAT WE HAVE HERE AS FAR AS INSPECTION FEES, IS BASICALLY BASED ON LINEAR FOOTAGES OR SQUARE FEET OF PAVEMENT PUT IN OR LINEAR FOOTAGES OF VARIOUS TYPES OF PIPELINES, AND THEN A SEPARATE KIND OF LUMP SUM FEE FOR STRUCTURES OF VARIOUS TYPES LIKE MANHOLES, DRAINAGE JUNCTION STRUCTURES, STORMWATER INLETS, AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE.
SO WE'RE BASICALLY LOOKING AT WHAT'S BEING INSTALLED, HOW MUCH TIME IT WOULD TAKE FOR CITY STAFF OR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR TO INSPECT THAT WORK, AND BACKING INTO A FEE BASED ON THAT, THE THE PLAN REVIEW FEES WERE ALSO INCREASED, AND WE ALSO INCLUDED A FAST TRACK REVIEW FEE.
THIS IS SOMETHING THAT A NUMBER OF CITIES HAVE IMPLEMENTED.
I KNOW MESQUITE HAS A FAST TRACK REVIEW FEE, WHICH IS A SLIGHTLY HIGHER REVIEW FEE TO BASICALLY FOR STAFF TO DROP EVERYTHING THEY'RE DOING AND TO CONCENTRATE ON A PROJECT.
[00:35:08]
CONSTRUCTION LOANS AND SO FORTH. SHAVING A WEEK OFF OR A COUPLE WEEKS OFF PLAN REVIEW ACTUALLY HAS FINANCIAL ADVANTAGES FOR THEM.AND BASICALLY STAFF WOULD HAVE TO DROP EVERYTHING THEY'RE DOING, SIT DOWN WITH THEIR PLAN, SET, KNOCK IT OUT. USUALLY THAT'S DONE BY INVITING THEM INTO A MEETING WHERE WE DO THE PLAN REVIEW RIGHT WITH THEM LOOKING OVER OUR SHOULDER, WORK THROUGH THE WHOLE SET OF PLANS. IT MIGHT TAKE 4 TO 8 HOURS AND THEN GET THEM OUT THE DOOR SO THAT THEY CAN MOVE FASTER WITH THEIR PROJECT.
SO THAT'S BASICALLY WHAT WE'RE DOING HERE. WE ALSO PROVIDED MORE GRANULARITY AS FAR AS PLAN REVIEW FOR SMALLER PROJECTS SO WE COULD REDUCE THOSE FEES FOR THE SMALLER PROJECTS. THE SINGLE FAMILY HOME, PEOPLE THAT WANT TO PUT IN A CULVERT OR THEY'RE JUST DEVELOPING A SINGLE LOT THAT THEY THAT'S KIND OF AN INFILL TYPE LOT PROJECT.
SO IT KIND OF REDUCES THOSE, MAKES IT EASIER FOR THOSE TYPE OF PROJECTS TO PROCEED.
OKAY. SO AGAIN THE MAIN IMPETUS IS THE STATE LAW CHANGE IS WHAT.
IT'S BOTH TOGETHER AND I THINK IT'S BEST PRACTICE.
AGAIN, I THINK THIS WILL RECOVER OUR COSTS. I SPEND PROBABLY 40 TO 45% OF MY TIME WITH PRIVATE PLAN REVIEW AND COORDINATING WITH PLATS, SITE PLANS, BUILDING PLANS, AND OF COURSE, THE ENGINEERING PLANS ANSWERING A LOT OF QUESTIONS FROM THE DEVELOPER AND THEIR ENGINEERS.
SO THIS IS AN ATTEMPT TO CAPTURE MY TIME ELMER'S TIME.
HE'S HAVING TO BACK UP OUR INSPECTION STAFF TO SOME DEGREE OUT IN THE FIELD AND TO BASICALLY MAKE US WHOLE AND RECOVER THAT COST. CITY COST. YEAH, JUST ABOUT SHARING SOME EXPERIENCE.
SO WHAT THEY'RE DOING IS THEY ARE CREATING A CHATBOT.
THEY ARE THROWING ALL THE AUDIOS THAT ARE ALL THE THROWING ALL THE FEE, SCHEDULE EVERYTHING, ENGINEERING STANDARD, EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN EVERYTHING INTO THIS BUCKET.
RIGHT. THE NEW. THAT'S IT. THEN YOU THROW THAT ONE, THEN YOU COULD ASK A SIMPLE QUESTION WHAT WOULD IT TAKE TO BUILD THIS 1000 SQUARE FOOT? TELL YOU ALL THE REQUIREMENTS? I WILL GO GATHER INFORMATION, CROSS-CHECK EVERYTHING AND GET FOR YOU.
AND SO IT'S REALLY BECOMING A TOOL FOR MANY CITIES.
SO SOMETHING I CERTAINLY HOPE WE WILL WE WILL START UTILIZING AND MANY CITIES START USING IT.
AND I DON'T THINK IT'S QUITE MATURE YET, BUT IT'S COMING.
I PLAY WITH AI ALL THE TIME. IT'S REALLY PRETTY INTERESTING WHAT IT DOES.
THE PROBLEM WITH AI, THOUGH, IS THAT CURRENT AIS ARE JUST KIND OF LIKE THE HUMAN MIND.
THEY THEY CAN HALLUCINATE AND THEY CAN LIE. THAT'S THAT'S A PROBLEM.
SO WE HAVE TO BE CAREFUL. I KNOW ELON MUSK IS ADVERTISING HIS WILL BE HALLUCINATION FREE, BUT THAT IS A REAL THING, RIGHT? AND SO IT IT IT HAS TO BE IMPLEMENTED WITH GREAT CARE BECAUSE OF THOSE FACETS.
YOU'RE. ABSOLUTELY. I THINK THAT'S PART OF THE REASON WHY INSTEAD OF TRYING TO GO GATHER INFORMATION FROM THE INTERNET, THEY TRY TO CONTAIN THE SOURCE OF TRUTH, RIGHT? EXACTLY. FROM WHAT WE HAVE. YES, SIR. JUST TRYING TO MAKE SURE WE STAY ON TOPIC HERE.
YEAH. THIS IS THIS IS A TOPIC. THIS IS ON FEE SCHEDULE.
THIS IS ON FEE SCHEDULE. I JUST WANT TO GET ALL OF THEM THROWN IN.
THANK YOU. RACHEL. THAT WAY PEOPLE CAN ACCESS.
THE REASON IS I TRY TO READ THROUGH IT. AFTER FIVE MINUTES, I'M LOST.
I'M LOST AFTER FIVE MINUTES. IMAGINE WE GOT UDO AND WE GOT EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN.
WE GOT BUILDING PLAN. EVERYTHING RIGHT? OKAY.
ALL RIGHT. HOPEFULLY BY NEXT, PRETTY SOON. HERE, WE'LL HAVE SOMETHING. OKAY. ALL RIGHT.
MATT. THANK YOU. YOU BET. SIR. ALL RIGHT. OKAY, LET ME OPEN UP FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THIS ONE.
THE ENGINEERING FEES STRUCTURE. DOES ANYONE FROM THE MEMBERS AUDIENCE WOULD LIKE TO COME FORWARD AND SPEAK TO THE COUNCIL? YOU MAY DO SO AT THIS TIME. NO ONE IS COMING FORWARD.
I'M GOING TO CLOSE THAT PUBLIC INPUT ACCOUNT SHOULD HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS.
RIGHT. NUMBER. I LOST TRACK OF IT.
[00:40:02]
JJ1J1. IF NOT, CALL FOR A MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE. ITEM 1J1. AS PRESENTED. SECOND MOTION MADE BY MR. CLARK, SECONDED BY MAYOR PRO TEM FINCH TO APPROVE ITEM J ONE AS PRESENTED.SECOND. SECOND. SECOND. YEAH. SECOND. SECOND.
HOW ABOUT THAT? OH, I LIKE THAT. EVERYONE HAD THE MOTION OF THE ADDITIONAL DISCUSSIONS.
IF NOT, ALL IN FAVOR SIGNIFY ALL OPPOSED. MOTION PASSES.
SEVEN ONE WERE COMING. GET READY. MENU ITEM NUMBER J TWO.
MR.. GOOD EVENING. MAYOR. MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL, MARK RAUSCHER WITH THE TOWN OF SUNNYVALE.
TODAY WE'RE ASKING YOU FOR APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEERING DESIGN CONTRACT WITH HAF FOR THE DESIGN OF THE WHAT WE CALL THE SUNNYVALE ISD PORTION OF THE RAILS TO TRAILS, WHICH IS BASICALLY BOUNDED BY NANCE ROAD ON THE NORTH AND THEN TRIPP ROAD ON THE SOUTH.
THE THIS PROJECT IS BASICALLY THE CULMINATION OF A OF A GRANT ACQUISITION THAT WE WENT THROUGH BACK IN 2022 WHERE WE PROCURED A GRANT THROUGH THE NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS FOR THIS PROJECT.
WE WERE AWARDED THAT GRANT IN DECEMBER OF 2022 AT A AT A COST OF 2.2 MILLION.
THIS IS A 80, 20 FEDERAL LOCAL SPLIT PROJECT.
AND THE DESIGN PIECE IS, IS BASICALLY BEING FUNDED BY THE TOWN THROUGH OUR FY 25 CAPITAL PROJECT BUDGET. AND THESE SERVICES WILL WILL BASICALLY BE CRADLE TO GRAVE FOR THIS EFFORT BECAUSE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL EXCUSE ME, BECAUSE OF THE FEDERAL NATURE OF THESE FUNDS, WE DO HAVE AN ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENT THAT WE NEED TO GO THROUGH AND ARCHEOLOGICAL SURVEY WORK AND SO ON AND SO FORTH. AND SO THE THE ENTIRE PROJECT FROM, YOU KNOW, THOSE ASPECTS ALL THE WAY THROUGH BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES IS A TOTAL OF $616,000. AGAIN, WE'RE LOOKING FOR APPROVAL TONIGHT, AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE.
MR.. DO YOU HAVE A QUESTION, SIR? JUST TO CONFIRM, THIS IS FOR, LIKE YOU SAID, INCEPTION TO COMPLETION, $616,000, CORRECT? YES, SIR. FOR THE THE CONCRETE.
EVERYTHING RIGHT? OKAY. YEAH. THIS IS EVERYTHING. WHAT'S THE WIDTH OF THAT TRAIL? IT'S A 12 FOOT WIDE TRAIL. EXTENDING AGAIN FROM NANCE TO TRIP.
AND THEN THERE ARE. HOW LONG IS THAT TRAIL? APPROXIMATELY.
IT'S IT'S ABOUT 1800 LINEAR FEET. AND THEN THERE ARE ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK CONNECTIONS THAT WILL COME OFF THE TRAIL INTO THE SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY AT THREE DIFFERENT LOCATIONS. AND THOSE, THOSE PARTICULAR SIDEWALK EXTENSIONS WILL BE EIGHT FOOT WIDE.
AS OPPOSED TO THE 12, YOU KNOW, USUALLY YOUR LINEAR TRAIL IS GOING TO BE THE WIDER, YOU KNOW, STEM, IF YOU WILL, OR TRUNK AND THAT'S 12 FOOT.
SO MARK, I HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS. I WAS READING THROUGH THE HALF AN ASSOCIATES REPORT.
THEY SAID THEY ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION.
OTHER IS THERE ANY RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION ON THIS PROJECT RIGHT NOW? THERE ARE NONE FOR THIS, FOR THIS SECTION OF TRAIL THERE.
THERE ARE NO RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITIONS REQUIRED.
WE ARE LOOKING AT JUST LIKE A JOINT USE AGREEMENT WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. AND WE'VE HAD NUMEROUS DISCUSSIONS WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. AND THEY THEY'RE IN FAVOR OF THIS PROJECT AND HAVE BEEN GREAT PARTNERS TO WORK WITH SO FAR.
AND JUST 616,000 IS THE TOTAL PORTION OF. THAT'S 30% OF OUR MONEY.
THE 616,000 IS TOWN MONEY. AND THIS FUNDS THE ENTIRE DESIGN OF THE PROJECT, INCLUDING ALL THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND ARCHEOLOGICAL REVIEWS, AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AND BIDDING SERVICES AND THE.
SO WE HAVE ENOUGH MONEY, 80% WILL WHAT WE HAVE THE GRANT MONEY WILL COVER THE TOTAL COST, RIGHT? YEAH. THE GRANT MONEY WILL HELP COVER THE ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PART.
DOES IT HELP? I SAID, WOULD THAT COVER THE 80 PERCENTAGE? THE THE 80% OF THE COST? YEAH, 80% IS THE FEDERAL.
AND THE BULK OF THAT'S GOING TO BE ON THE CONSTRUCTION SIDE OF IT FOR THE DESIGN, WHICH, YOU KNOW, THIS CONTRACT TONIGHT IS FOR THE DESIGN PIECE.
WHAT IS THE TIMELINE FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION? SO STAFF HAS TOLD US THAT IT'S ROUGHLY A 12 MONTH TIME FRAME TO GET ALL THE DESIGNS COMPLETED AND GET IT READY FOR CONSTRUCTION BIDDING, AND THEN IT'LL BE ANOTHER 12 MONTHS, YOU KNOW, OF THE THE WHOLE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS, SELECTING A CONTRACTOR,
[00:45:03]
GETTING THEM MOBILIZED AND COMPLETING THE WORK.SO ALL IN ALL, WE'RE LOOKING AT FALL OF 2026 FOR THIS FOR THIS PROJECT TO BE FINISHED.
ONE LAST QUESTION. RIGHT. SO SO WE ELECTRICITY, ELECTRIC LIGHTS, STREET LIGHTS, ALL OF THEM. AND THE INTENT IS TO PUT IT PUT POWER LINES OR THIS IS NOT A SOLAR LIGHT.
CONSIDERATION IS EXPENSIVE, RIGHT? THIS IS WONDERING.
THIS OH, MAYOR, THIS THIS SECTION IS ON THE RIGHT OF WAY THAT THE TOWN PURCHASED FROM THE POWER COMPANY THAT USED TO HAVE A RAIL LINE THAT WENT UP TO THE POWER PLANT THAT WAS USED TO BRING EQUIPMENT INTO THE POWER PLANT.
SO THERE ARE NO OVERHEAD LINES ALONG THIS ALIGNMENT.
SO WE COULD INSTALL SOLAR LIGHTING ON THIS SECTION OF TRAIL IF DESIRED, BY THE COUNCIL.
IT'S NOT MORE THAN DECIDED BY THE COUNCIL, RIGHT? IT'S JUST. WHAT IS THE RIGHT DECISION? ENGINEERING DECISION. RIGHT. THAT'S JUST THAT'S JUST ONE OPTION, RIGHT? THAT'S JUST. WE'D HAVE TO LOOK AT IT. THERE IS A LOT OF AMBIENT LIGHTING FROM THE SCHOOLS THEMSELVES, BUT WE'D HAVE TO REALLY KIND OF LOOK AT IT AND SEE WHAT SORT OF AMBIENT LIGHTING WE HAVE FROM LIKE THE STADIUM AND PLAY FIELDS AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE.
BUT WE COULD CERTAINLY LOOK AT IT. MOST CITIES ALSO PUT RESTRICTIONS ON THE TIME OF USE FOR TRAILS IN ORDER TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY'RE NOT BEING USED IN AT NIGHT, WHERE YOU KNOW, THERE MIGHT BE SAFETY ISSUES INVOLVED.
SO BUT IF WE WANT A LONGER PERIOD OF TIME, WE COULD CERTAINLY LOOK AT ADDING LIGHTING TO THE TRAIL.
THAT'S THE CURRENT PLAN INCLUDE INSTALLING LIGHTING OR.
NO, THERE ARE NO PLANS FOR FOR THIS SECTION OF TRAIL TO ADD ADD LIGHTING AT THIS POINT.
BUT MAYOR, JUST TO CLARIFY, WE HAVEN'T ACTUALLY STARTED THE DESIGN, SO I GOT IT.
BUT THAT IS CERTAINLY EXPECTATION DESIGN INTENT.
WE WE SAID WHAT DO WE WANT THEM TO DESIGN. RIGHT.
WE CAN CERTAINLY HAVE THAT INCORPORATED INTO THE DESIGN POTENTIALLY IF THAT'S SOMETHING THE THE PRECEDENT WOULD BE, ARE WE GOING TO INSTALL THE SOLAR LIGHTS THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE RAIL TO TRAIL CORRIDOR IF IT IS, IF IT IS ULTIMATELY BUILT. WE DON'T KNOW. WE DON'T HAVE THE OTHER PLAN.
WE DON'T HAVE THE MONEY YET. SO ALL WE KNOW IS WHAT WE HAVE, RIGHT? FIVE YEARS FROM NOW, TEN YEARS FROM NOW, WILL WE DO? WE DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER FOR THAT, RIGHT? I MEAN, IF THAT'S THE RIGHT SOLUTION, THAT'S THE RIGHT SOLUTION, RIGHT? AND THERE ARE OTHER SECTIONS OF THE RAILS TO TRAILS THAT DO HAVE THE THE POWER LINE CONFLICT, YOU KNOW, UP NORTH, NORTH OF TOWN EAST.
AND SO WE'LL BE LIMITED IN SOME OF THOSE AREAS BECAUSE OF THE POWER LINES.
I JUST DON'T LIKE DARK AREAS IN GENERAL. RIGHT.
WHERE PUBLIC USE, THAT'S JUST WHERE I'M THINKING. OKAY.
COUNTER. ADDITIONAL QUESTION FOR MR. RAUSCHER.
AS A MATTER OF FACT, WE CONTINUE TO BUILD ON.
YEAH. MR. CLARK. RIGHT. IS IS THE SCHOOL IS THE ISD INVOLVED, OR WILL THEY BE INVOLVED AT LEAST INTERACTING ABOUT THIS? YOU KNOW, BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO BE RIGHT NEXT TO THEM. AND WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THREE PATHWAYS.
YES, SIR. WE'VE ACTUALLY HAD SEVERAL MEETINGS WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICT.
AND, YOU KNOW, IF YOU LOOK AT THE THE MAP, THAT'S PART OF THE THE SCOPE PROPOSAL, THEY ACTUALLY HELPED US WITH, WITH MODIFYING SOME OF THESE YELLOW ALIGNMENTS THAT YOU SEE THERE, THE EIGHT FOOT WIDE SIDEWALK CONNECTIONS BASED UPON SOME OF THEIR FACILITY PLANNING.
SO LIKE I SAID BEFORE, WE'VE HAD GREAT DIALOG WITH THEM. THEY'VE BEEN GREAT PARTNERS, AND WE LOOK FORWARD TO CONTINUING TO WORK WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. OKAY. AND THAT'S THAT'S I KNOW, BECAUSE THERE'S OBVIOUSLY BONDS COMING UP IN A FEW WEEKS.
AND IF THAT PASSES, THERE'S GOING TO BE SOME NEW FACILITIES BUILT.
YOU BET. YES, SIR. MARK, I HAVE ONE MORE QUESTION FOR YOU.
SO THE ONE ON THE SOUTH END OF THE FOOTBALL FIELD. YES, SIR.
IS THAT GOING TO BE HIGH AND DRY OF THAT RETENTION POND? I'M ASSUMING IT WOULD BE. SO IT'S REALLY KIND OF A RHETORICAL QUESTION, BUT NOT REALLY. YEAH.
IT'S NOT IT'S NOT GOING TO INTERFERE WITH ANY KIND OF RETENTION POND. YEAH. YOU THERE. YOU KNOW, THE RETENTION POND I'M TALKING ABOUT. THERE'S ONE BEHIND THE FOOTBALL STADIUM. YES, SIR. IT JUST LOOKS LIKE IT'S RIGHT ON THE EDGE OF IT. YEAH, WE'LL BE JUST SOUTH OF THAT.
[00:50:04]
YEAH, IT'S BASICALLY REPLACING HOW MUCH YOU WALK THESE THINGS, LARRY.RIGHT. AND, JEEZ, I JUST I'D BE CONCERNED ABOUT EROSION OF THE RETENTION POND.
OOH. OH, THAT'S VERY DARK. OKAY. WELL, WE'LL CERTAINLY LOOK AT THAT.
I MEAN, THAT'S WHY WE HAVE ENGINEERS ON BOARD HERE TO TO DESIGN THIS PROJECT FOR US AND US.
AND LOOK AT ANY, YOU KNOW, WETLAND ISSUES OR CONSTRUCTABILITY ISSUES.
WELL I'M EXCITED. THIS IS I'VE BEEN WORKING ON THIS SINCE FOR BE EARLY DAYS.
SO SEVEN YEARS. AND I THINK IT EXTENDED 7 OR 8 YEARS BEFORE MY TIME.
SO I THINK THIS IS 15 YEARS WE'VE BEEN WORKING ON THIS.
SO IT'S EXCITING TO SEE WE'RE PUTTING SHOVELS TO THE GROUND AND GETTING THINGS MOVING.
SO REALLY APPRECIATE IT. STAFF GOOD WORK. THANK YOU.
OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. USHER. OKAY. THANK YOU.
MR.. LET ME TAKE PUBLIC COMMENTS. IF THERE'S ANYONE FROM THE MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE WOULD LIKE TO COME FORWARD AND SPEAK TO THE COUNCIL ON THIS ITEM, YOU MAY COME FORWARD. YOU MAY DO SO AT THIS TIME.
NO ONE IS COMING FORWARD. SO I'M GOING TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC COMMENTS. COUNCIL. OTHER ADDITIONAL DISCUSSIONS OR COMMENTS? IF NOT, I CALL FOR A MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE. SECOND.
COME ON, MISS DANNY, A CHANCE. QUICK MOTION. WAS MADE BY MR. CLARKE, SECONDED BY MR. FINCH, TO APPROVE ITEM NUMBER.
MR. ALLEN. MR. ALLEN, THANK YOU. ELDRIDGE AND ALLEN.
ELDRIDGE. ANDERSON. CLARKE. OKAY. WHO WANTS TO BE THE MOTION? MR. ELDRIDGE MADE THE MOTION SECONDED BY MR. ALLEN, TO APPROVE ITEM NUMBER J TWO, AS PRESENTED.
EVERYONE HEARD THE MOTION. ARE THERE ADDITIONAL DISCUSSIONS? I DON'T KNOW IF I CAN VOTE FOR THIS. THE ONLY, ONLY THING IN A MAD.
AS WE DESIGN WISE, I WOULD RECOMMEND WE LOOK INTO SOME SORT OF LIGHTING.
SOLAR MAY BE THE WAY TO GO, BUT I WILL LET YOU BE THE ENGINEER AND MAKE THE DECISION.
YOU AND ALMA TO BE THE DECISION MAKER. THAT'S ONLY COMMON TO HAVE.
OKAY. THERE ARE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. IF NOT, ALL IN FAVOR, SIGNIFY ALL OPPOSED.
MOTION PASSED SEVEN. THANK YOU, MR. USHER. THANK YOU.
MOVING ON TO ITEM NUMBER THREE, J3 DISCUSS AND ACT UPON RESOLUTION 20 2419.
AND TODAY WAS THE LAST DAY. WITH THAT, THERE ARE NO ACTION TO BE TAKEN.
ITEM NUMBER J4 MAYOR AND COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR FUTURE STAFF.
UPDATES ON AGENDA ITEMS. ARE THERE ANY ITEMS FOR THE COUNCIL? OKAY, IF NOT, I'M GOING TO CLOSE THAT ITEM UP.
[K. Executive Session ]
CAN I HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 551 .071 CONSULTATION WITH ATTORNEY ON FOUR DIFFERENT TOPICS AND 551 .087 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GATEWAY PARK AND 551 .07 FOR PERSONNEL MATTERS.TOWN ATTORNEY CONTRACT. LOOKING FOR MOTION. THERE.
I'M LOOKING FOR. I'M LOOKING FOR MOTION. MOTION.
MOTION TO ADJOURN INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION. SECOND MOTION MADE BY MR..
SECOND BY MISS DANIEL INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION ON THESE TWO ITEMS. EVERYONE HEARD THE MOTION. ALL IN FAVOR SIGNIFY ALL OPPOSED.
MOTION PASSED SEVEN ZERO. TIME IS 8:00. WE ARE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION.
OKAY, NOW TIME IS 922. WE ARE BACK IN OPEN SESSION.
[L. End Executive Session ]
I CAN CONFIRM THAT AS A RESULT OF THE EXECUTIVE SESSION, NO ACTION NEEDS TO BE TAKEN WITH THAT COUNCIL.CAN I HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN? MOTION. SECOND.
MOTION MADE BY MR.. SECOND. BY. MR.. WOODROW.
WOODROW. TO ADJOURN. ALL IN FAVOR SIGNIFY. ALL OPPOSED.
MOTION PASSES SEVEN ZERO. MEETING'S ADJOURNED.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.